I respect people’s right to use apple products, but please stop asserting “privacy”, big corps doesn’t give a shit.

  • Fizz@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    2 months ago

    Hardware really needs to be opened. So many issues are caused by people being unable to get away from large company control due to them beinf the only ones able to get decent hardware.

      • Auli@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        And it sucks last I heard. And the hardware is very outdated. I wish Ubuntu would try again.

        • jcs@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          If we wish to change the status quo yet ignore the ones actively challenging it, what are we left with? I can almost guarantee you that a Canonical-produced phone would certainly progress mobile Linux but would not be released as OSHW.

          And it sucks last I heard.

          I’ve been using one as my daily-driver since March 2023. It’s not a phone for everyone; I wouldn’t recommend it to my parents, but it doesn’t suck as long as you are not expecting feature parity with flagship proprietary options in a trillion-dollar market. Bugs get squashed over time, and there is power in numbers. Even the iPhone started out somewhere.

          And the hardware is very outdated.

          I’m sure that Purism would appreciate ideas you may have for an OSHW/FOSS-friendly processor unencumbered by NDA, that’s well-documented, has long-term market availability, doesn’t take half the real estate of the L5’s PCB, would allow more than 2 hr of runtime, that… you get the idea. Available processor options are limited if the device should be even remotely open. Spinning one from scratch is prohibitively expensive.