• GroundedGator@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    I have a friend with a Subaru he didn’t drive much. Battery kept dieing on him. He determined that with the car of there was a small drain on the battery. Took quite a bit to figure out that the issue was the old 3g connection for starlink. Even though he hadn’t ever paid for the service, the car still kept trying to connect to the cell network. With 3g retired, it had nothing to connect to.

    I also have a Subaru with a 3g connection I never replaced, but it’s a daily driver. From what I can tell on forums, this only became a problem once there was no longer a 3g network. Just curious that even without the subscription the car was connecting to something and now that there is no connection, it will continuously try to connect.

    There is a bypass module that can be purchased, because apparently if you just pull the fuse, you lose Bluetooth and the front speakers. You can keep Bluetooth by having an aftermarket headunit which bypasses the manufacturer Bluetooth.

    • Katana314@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      3 days ago

      No it isn’t. I went to the Gas Store and bought one Gas and they asked me for a $70 bill. He even gave me my change: One $Change.

      • abysmalpoptart@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        I think that the commenter is referring to the grammar. It should read “it costs,” not “it cost.” It makes it seem like they are referring to a very specific previous drive, but that context isn’t provided here

        • Holytimes@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          It cost 70 dollars to drive it to and from work is how I took it.

          They are dropping the implied context which is rather normal in regular speech but weird for themis comic

          • abysmalpoptart@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            Yes, but even then you should be referring to a single instance of driving to and from work. If you’re speaking generally, you would still use “costs” because that implies an ongoing situation.

            “On Thursday, it cost $70 to drive to work” would be appropriate.

    • QuarterSwede@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 days ago

      It isn’t when you have an EV. I just had this conversation with my wife a few days ago. My EV is $22/mo in electricity with my commute. My old gas car was $150/mo at best. What the comic leaves out is the cost of insurance on the EV being about $150/mo and my old car was dirt cheap so it’s almost a wash. The EV is a hell of a lot more fun to drive though.

      • abysmalpoptart@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I think they meant literally, “it cost” as in past tense. If you’re referring to a specific, previous event, then it makes grammatical sense. But it sounds like he’s comparing the cars generally, so it sounds more appropriate to say “it costs”

    • HarneyToker@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 days ago

      I’ve known plenty of people with Subarus and none have had head gasket issues. I think the problem is exaggerated because it’s memed.

      • This2ShallPass@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I think it WAS a problem in older models. Caused me to get rid of my 2004 Forester. That being said, I still managed to get around 180,000 miles on it before it was an issue.

        • HarneyToker@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          180,000 miles is the lifetime of a lot of cars, so that’s pretty good. You’d be hard pressed to find many examples of vehicles that have had no problems through 180,000 miles unless it’s a Honda or Toyota.

        • HarneyToker@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          Sorry about that. My Mazdaspeed3 has been running with no problems since 2013 despite all the concerns about VVT/timing chain problems and bad turbo seals you see all over the internet. Another Chevy of mine I once had was rife with problems even though I did all the proper maintenance.

  • Blaster M@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    The EV is definitely a money improvement. A new battery and the Subaru will sell for a pretty penny, though.

    • SomeAmateur@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      I’m not against them, but I wonder how EVs will hold up in the long haul. Like in 20 years will there even be a feasible used market or will the batteries and motors be too shitty without a crazy expensive replacements to keep them practical?

      And then there’s the scrapping process for batteries too. Can batteries be refurbished, scrapped or recycled in a way that most regions can do it?

      Like LEDs I know they CAN be built to last a long time, but I know companies often don’t

  • VM_Abrantes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    God, I really wish Subaru would just make their own EVs in-house instead of slapping their logo on a bunch of Toyotas

    • Frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Not just that, but a Toyota that is the most “eh, good enough” EV there is.

      Have a bz4x because we got a very, very good deal on it. Do not recommend unless you also get a very, very good deal. It’s aggressively OKish.