• scarabic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    6 months ago

    What the capitalists did was pay all the workers right after they did the work, even though the phones wouldn’t actually be sold for some time after that. Capitalists bring capital. Money. It takes money to get things started.

    I completely agree that the rewards are all disproportionate. The people who put up the capital shouldn’t get all the rewards. But it’s just dumb to claim that they play no role at all. If that’s true, walk out of your house and make a phone you designed yourself out of sticks you find on the ground.

      • scarabic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        6 months ago

        The same place the fed and skilled laborers came from: the proceeds of previous enterprises.

        • bitjunkie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 months ago

          A much higher financial incentive because they’d actually be the ones profiting from the sale of the phones. There are organizational structures other than corporations.

          • scarabic@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            6 months ago

            I was once asked to join a startup, and after a few chats I was ready to talk turkey. Then they sprung it on me that since there was no revenue yet, no one was making a wage. But my equity in the company would be correspondingly high.

            I couldn’t do it. I had bills to pay. I was stunned that they thought I could do this, and I slowly realized that everyone else there was an ex-Googler and basically rich already.

            So you see, I’ve been in the exact position you suggest your workers will jump at, and it does. not. work. People need to pay rent this month and can’t wait through a months long production chain and months long sales cycle all of which is full of risk. They need to get paid, for sure, not maybe, and now.

            I’m not in here touting the glory of capitalism as if it’s a wonderful system. But I’m also not spouting pure fantasy bullshit about alternatives we can just switch to easy-peasy, because that’s a bunch of half-baked idealistic crap.

            • bitjunkie@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              Yeah I mean I know it doesn’t work under this economic system, but that’s kind of the point I was making

              • scarabic@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 months ago

                I have heard this several times throughout this thread that sure, capital is necessary in this system, but that’s just an artifact imposed by this system. Under another system you wouldn’t need it.

                I’m still waiting to hear any system where startup costs are not a factor and people can work on a thing that does nothing to meet their short term needs.

                Are we talking about a utopia where all human needs have already been eliminated by magical technology so we can simply wander where we will and work on enriching projects that strike our fancy?

                To keep it focused: show me a system where you can get 200 people together to assemble phones with no capital at the outset.