• Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    1 month ago

    Everyone: “Stop using stuff made by Google that they make with intent of owning the web!”

    Also everyone: “Don’t you understand why WEBP is the best format??”

    • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      One format to rule them all, One format to find them, One format to bring them all, and in the darkness bind them; In the Land of the Bay Area where the shadows lie.

  • Riskable@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 month ago

    I really like WebP. It has a super annoying issue though: Animated WebP can’t take advantage of hardware acceleration.

    And the real problem there is that WebM doesn’t support looping. So if you want an auto playing, looping gif-like video you have to use WebP and thus, give up on hardware acceleration.

    • calcopiritus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      For me it’s the opposite. Lossy ones (the ones that seem to maintain quality while lowering size by a lot) are magic to me but lossless is understandable.

      What do you mean “treat this image as a wave and do an inverse Fourier transform on it in order to discard the high frequency low amplitude noise”. wtf? Straight up magic.

      • LegoBrickOnFire@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        I guess there are two kinds of magic. There is the magic of Fourrier which is lossy with funny math. But it is understandable that one can get higher compression ratios when it’s lossy. But I find it even more magic that we can still find better ways to encode images losslessly. I would have thought we had already long found the optimal way

        • LeFantome@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          Look at everyday things that occasionally improve. We have probably not found the optimal way for almost anything.

          Most of us just are not smart enough to find a better way.