• jubilationtcornpone@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    6 months ago

    Ms Owens’ lawyers have responded to the Macrons’ lawsuit with a motion to dismiss, arguing that the case should not have been filed in Delaware, as she says it does not relate to her businesses, which are incorporated in the state. They claim forcing her to defend the case in Delaware would cause “substantial financial and operational hardship”.

    It definitely relates to her businesses since her business is primarily manufacturing and spreading bullshit.

  • A_norny_mousse@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    6 months ago

    Seriously, he’s validating this BS?

    Well they both have reason to feel very self-conscious about their marriage.

    • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      6 months ago

      They’re presenting evidence to a court in a defamation case. This isn’t validating it at all, they’re arguing the claims constitute gross disregard for the truth

  • abbiistabbii@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    6 months ago

    I hate this transphobic present. Oh, you don’t look exactly as we want you to look? Prove you’re not trans, if you’re not trans we’ll leave you alone, if you are, we’ll make your life a living hell.

    Fuck.

  • D_C@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    6 months ago

    Good. She’ll continue to parrot this type of bullshit whilst she is making money from doing it and feels safe enough to carry on.

    She will carry on making others lives miserable until there are consequences.
    Soon as you hit them with a monetary or physical consequence they will stop. Just ask Charlie Kirk…