• chunes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      15 days ago

      I legitimately have no idea how that man keeps going. Pretty sure I would’ve hung my hat up after the first 3 or 4 decades when things kept getting worse.

  • Jay@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    15 days ago

    BREAKING NEWS " Sanders calls genocide a “genocide”

  • qevlarr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    15 days ago

    Wow, a big step for Sanders. This shows it is becoming more mainstream to acknowledge the genocide. I know it’s common sense for us here, but mainstream acceptance is extremely important here. A long way to go, but this is good news

  • DarkCloud@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    edit-2
    15 days ago

    A few years ago he said “Criticizing Israel is not antisemitic” - this REALLY HELPED criticism be heard at all.

    • Gladaed@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      14 days ago

      It is. How is that bad? A country is doing stuff in another with military force without consent. That’s war. (If prolonged)

      • crapwittyname@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        14 days ago

        It’s bad because it suggests two matched belligerents. It’s like the difference between a boxing match with a skill gap, and a boxer violently murdering a child with a pretext. Also the child has been rendered physically and mentally disabled by the boxer’s previous activity. Also the boxer locks the child up and deprives it of food and water and shelter.
        Not all that comparable

        • Gladaed@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          14 days ago

          No it doesn’t suggest matched belligerents. Real life ain’t no sport. Falkland war is also called that.

          • WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            14 days ago

            It’s not a war because Israel doesn’t acknowledge it as a war. If it were a war, they would be treating Hamas as an actual military and be following the Geneva convention. Israel does not treat the thousands of Gazan hostages it’s abducted, who it nominally labels as “Hamas,” anything like what is required by the Geneva convention.

            It’s not a war because Israel has chosen not to treat it like a war.

            • Gladaed@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              14 days ago

              There is no thing forcing you to adhere to international law. You don’t have to follow Geneva Convention. You might be executed for it if caught outside of your country or if another country seems to stop you, but there is no compulsion there.

              • WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                14 days ago

                So your defense of Israel is that “well aktually the laws of war don’t technically apply to them!”

                Fuck off with this genocide apologia. If you need to split hairs on the technical definition of the laws of war, you’re obviously doing something indefensible. Only Nazi trash feels the need to equivocate on something as unforgivable as genocide and war crimes.

                Seriously, you need a therapist or a priest. Your soul is clearly broken.

                • Gladaed@feddit.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  14 days ago

                  I don’t apologize genocide. I just say that they lead a war. A lot of genocides happened in war. It is ludicrous to forbid calling a war a war just because genocide is used in it.

                  There is no natural force stopping war crimes.

      • brendansimms@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        14 days ago

        No. One country, backed by all the money and weapons of the west, was given land that was stolen from palestine in 1948, then they proceeded to slowly eradicate and remove the palestinian population. Just look at maps of palestine from 1948 to today, and watch the genocides progression.

      • hayvan@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        14 days ago

        If I pulled a gun and killed an unarmed person, would you call that a fight?

        • Zink@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          14 days ago

          If the united states randomly decided to hit every square kilometer of Liechtenstein with its own hydrogen bomb in the middle of the night, would you call that a war?

  • Mrkawfee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    edit-2
    14 days ago

    I saw a horrifying estimate of 680,000 murdered by israel in Gaza. Ten times the official figure. This is almost a third of the pre genocide population. It is a holocaust.

    • TheMinions@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      14 days ago

      FYI I believe that’s the estimated casualty list.

      Confirmed deaths are slightly below 70,000.

      Absolutely horrific stuff, still.

      • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        14 days ago

        That 70k barelly changed since Israel destroyed most of the hospitals in Gaza were the counting was done more than 9 months ago.

        You see, that is the number of officially counted and identified dead, so to be counted the actual corpse has to be found (often amongst the rubble of bombed out buildings) in good enough condition to be identified, it has to be brough to a hospital were they do the counting and it has to be actually identified by somebody and against the list of Gaza residents.

        For all those things to actually happen to a corpse in a highly urban war zone where entire families are wiped out when 2000lb bombs are dropped on buildings (so, who is going to identify the corpses?) the corpse has to be transported all the way to a hospital within a rubble-strewned city were over 70% of the buildings are destroyed, large parts are occupied by an enemy with a shoot on sight policity and which often targets ambulances, and the aggressor has activelly targetted the very places where the counting of dead is done, all of which by now adds to a very low probability combination, hence why that official number massivelly slowed down its increase around 9 months ago, when Israel destroyed most Gaza hospitals - it was hard enough to have all those events around a corpse happen when Gaza was still mainly intact, barelly occupied and Israel hadn’t been activelly suppressing the counting, and by now is very low probability.

        Meanwhile in a letter of a researcher to the Lancet Medical Journal (edit: per the reference from another poster) over 6 months ago in July 20, 2024, they estimated around near 200k dead and this was before the man-made famine.

        The IDF themselves have recently admitted having killed over 220k people.

        All put together means that 600k estimate is very likely to be way closer to reality than the official 70k and might even be lower than reality.

      • crapwittyname@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        14 days ago

        That number is a very conservative estimate.

        In recent conflicts, such indirect deaths range from three to 15 times the number of direct deaths. Applying a conservative estimate of four indirect deaths per one direct death to the 37 396 deaths reported, it is not implausible to estimate that up to 186 000 or even more deaths could be attributable to the current conflict in Gaza.

        The Lancet vol. 404, Issue 10449 p237-238July 20, 2024

        Applying that now would suggest around 300k deaths, close to one in seven Palestinians in Gaza killed by the IDF.

          • Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            14 days ago

            No, there’s probably a lot more deaths that weren’t logged as deaths or casualties, because they were unreachable. We won’t have a real count until we can compare populations before and after.

            • TheMinions@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              14 days ago

              Correct, which is why we should mention — the still horrific — number of deaths and casualties. Then say that the confirmed death count hasn’t change because the hospitals in Gaza have been reduced to rubble, so official counts have barely updated for months.

  • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    14 days ago

    No centrist will ever call it a genocide, but people are sure angry that a man who introduced multiple bills to cease or condition weapons sales didn’t say the word as soon as they wanted.

    These are the same people who called people trumpers when they said that harris should show some daylight between herself and biden’s “whatever netanyahu-senpai wants” policies.

  • Omega@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    15 days ago

    I’m more concerned about the people who don’t want to condemn genocide than the people who are cautious about using the term.

  • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    14 days ago

    I love Bernie. I think he’s one of the greatest people we have in this world. That being said it’s about goddamn time. He’s been avoiding saying that for a very very very long time.

      • Bane_Killgrind@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        14 days ago

        He made it pretty clear. If it’s a genocide, that’s an argument for the courts, and the thing that needs something done about it is the starving people and indiscriminate killing of civilians.

        The “is it or isn’t it” debate is a bullshit distraction from the fact that isreal is killing it’s citizens.