I’m not sure what kind of algorithm they could use to find CSAM.

sauce

  • NoiseColor @lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’ve not looked into this chat control thing (I did sign the thing opposing it, don’t worry), what’s it about? Specifically, how would they prevent me using a chat app they can’t look into?

    It’s a stupid thing to go at anyway, chat. Its obvious people will hate it and organize against it. On the other actual pedos will find a way to encrypt it if they know someone could be watching. And on the other other hand they set so many guardrails, it would take a shitton of judges and signatures to actually go and look.

    It would make way more sense to put more effort in other places. I think, but I don’t know a lot about hunting pedos.

    • killingspark@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      how would they prevent me using a chat app they can’t look into?

      I dont think they can, unless they get android and iOS to do this os wide. The bigger problem is: will the public care enough to use such a messenger? Will they do it when it becomes illegal to use such a messenger? If not, mass surveillance is inevitable and those sidestepping it for important privacy reasons are easily detectable making them easy targets.

        • killingspark@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          Pretty much every messenger is built around a central server. Tracing connections to that server is not without hassle but doable with government resources. Now, a Briar-Style P2P Network could work but that has it’s own problems. Central servers are popular for a reason.