• absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    7 days ago

    You are gaining (or losing) energy based on if you are traveling in the same direction at the planet or not.

    If you are coming from behind (travelling in the same direction) you an falling into the gravity well for longer. Thus gaining more energy. The extra energy is based on the speed of the planet through space.

    Conversely if you an coming from the front, you fall for a shorter period. You lose energy at you climb up the gravity well.

  • mr_azerty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    What bothers me is I often read they are using the planet’s gravity to gain speed. Whatever speed an objet may gain while entering orbit should be lost when exiting it, right ? So I guess it’s the cinetic energy of the planet that is actually fuelling the spacecraft, isn’t it ?

    • tiramichu@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 days ago

      Yes. If the planet was stationary in space, it wouldn’t work. Approach from ‘behind’ the planet and you get a boost, approach from the ‘front’ and you hit the brakes.

  • d00ery@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    This is a sling. Bottom right corner is a catapult and uses stored energy (the elastic - sorry if wrong wording.) To me at least the idea of a sling that pivots around the user’s hand is much closer to the action of using a planet’s gravitational pull to sling a satellite craft onwards.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sling_(weapon)

    • Ziglin (it/they)@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      You wouldn’t want to do it with a satellite and I’ve only ever heard of it being called a slingshot (which usually refers to the device pictured in the meme, likely increasing clarity) or a gravity assist.

      The motion does seem to be more accurate though.

      • d00ery@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        Good point! A satellite is more likely to orbit a planet monitoring things I guess? It’s been a while since I’ve played Kerbal Space Program.

        • Ziglin (it/they)@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 days ago

          Satellites are objects orbiting a planet or some other smaller object. One could argue that it is a satellite on the way though too.

          I find the idea of an object like the moon doing a gravity assist around Jupiter to get to us very amusing.

    • rooster_butt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      46
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      Jupiter is used as a gravity assist to launch spacecraft further. This maneuver is known as a slingshot.

    • funkajunk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      8 days ago

      Spacecraft can use the gravitional energy from Jupiter to perform a “slingshot” maneuver, gaining significant momentum and reaching the outer solar system with less fuel.

  • s@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    Ironic that Goliath was defeated by a sling and now our solar system’s Goliath is a sling