• Decq@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    23 days ago

    I really don’t get why you would need a mnemonic for a symbol that itself already is a mnemonic? How could it ever be confusing that big side is bigger than small side?

    • tiramichu@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      23 days ago

      Because everyone’s brain is different and things that make intuitive sense for one person don’t necessarily make the same sense to someone else.

      • Decq@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        23 days ago

        Yes, and that’s why they made the symbol portray what it means. I mean it’s even more clear than the equal sign, yet I haven’t heard of mnemonic’s for that?

        • Dharma Curious (he/him)@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          23 days ago

          Because there aren’t (in common use) multiple variations. If we used ≠ and ≈ to represent when the sum was arrived at via addition or subtraction, and only used = when you used both in the same equation, people would fuck that shit up all the time.

          Also, you use the equal sign a lot more frequently in life. More exposure makes us remember better

    • rmuk@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      23 days ago

      Right? How hard is it to remember that it’s an arrow that points at the biggest number? /s

  • SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    23 days ago

    big > small
    as in the symbol is big and open on one side and small and closed on the other. It could not possibly be more literal than that.

      • Honytawk@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        23 days ago

        Sure, but if you regularly use it, wouldn’t you think more about the symbol?

        And wouldn’t it make more sense to an adult brain to see one side wider and one side smaller and continue the line in order to understand which size is bigger?

    • TrackinDaKraken@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      23 days ago

      YES!

      Read left to right, they make perfect sense:

      Less than is <

      Greater than is >

      They all make visual sense:

      =

      ±

      <

  • Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    23 days ago

    My teacher said “Pac-Man wants to eat the number that gives him the highest score” and that sooo stuck with me

      • SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        23 days ago

        rule

        Calling that a rule is weird. Like do you have a rule which side of the knife is used to cut? Which part of the toothbrush goes in your mouth? You don’t? Right, cause it’s entirely obvious.

        • nyctre@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          23 days ago

          It’s more of a consensus, than a rule. It’s only obvious because of the way we phrase it and the consensus to use that symbol. But we could’ve just as well settled on something like “x follows y” or whatever and you’d have an arrow pointing at the bigger number. Or any other number of ways to compare without using that symbol exactly. It’s more a language than anything, really. What’s important is that everyone understands the same thing regardless of what symbol we use. That’s why everyone uses it like that, not because it’s obvious.

  • Barrymore@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    23 days ago

    I feel this deeply as a 30 year old that has to repeat in my head “Never Eat Soggy Waffles” every time I use a cardinal direction

  • Bluewing@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    23 days ago

    When I taught math to young students I used alligators…Muh haa/0/

    ****I’m leaving the random characters that have been added to my evil laugh. They were added by Zip the orange 3 month old terror kitten

  • Lemminary@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    23 days ago

    I’ve always found it interesting that many people have a hard time remembering this. I feel like it’s one of those self-describing symbols.

  • Gustephan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    23 days ago

    I just use both with a footnote that reads “one of these symbols always lies, one tells the truth. Determining which is which left as an exercise for the reader”

  • porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    23 days ago

    I am also an idiot who needs mnemonics to remember incredibly basic stuff. In a similar vein to OOP, I did a PhD in chemistry with substantial involvement with chiral structures and still don’t really know left from right… but I never understood this one. Smaller number on the small side, bigger number on the big side always seemed really intuitive.

    Also in a theoretical physics context I think of those symbols as Dirac notation more often than inequalities, but then I’m not a physicist.

  • Seeker of Carcosa@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    22 days ago

    I saw the angles and assumed this was a joke about Dirac notation, which I’m still convinced is a massive joke to get mathematical physicists seriously talking about bras and ket in the staff room.

  • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    23 days ago

    I know someone who did their entire thesis purposely without using effect/affect, because they didn’t know the difference. Instead used “impact” and other similar words.

    • rmuk@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      23 days ago

      I can only imagine the impact that had on the end result’s impact. Probably didn’t have the impact they wanted on the readers who were unimpacted by the message.