NASA, with the tampons.

  • brem@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    8 days ago

    One of my favorite things about Lemmy ~ Star Trek references can occur anywhere, at any given moment.

    I have a personal metric system for rating social networking platforms based on the percentage of Trekkies/Trekkers.

      • ameancow@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        As a purist, we can agree that the only real series was TNG, this was the cornerstone, built on the hallowed but kind of silly ground made by the original series, but followed by DS9 when we grew up a little, and we can kinda accept Voyager was a thing that happened somewhere in the distance but we don’t get too close.

        There was nothing else. The franchise ended and we all moved on, happy for the good run. “ALL GOOD THINGS…”

          • ameancow@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 days ago

            why should anyone care about your arbitrary opinion

            By this metric, what’s the point of even browsing any forums or websites at all? Everything is someone’s arbitrary opinion, if it makes you feel bad to read something you disagree with, you can’t fix that outside of yourself.

            • atomic@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              7 days ago

              I love that your response to what a “star trek purist” is is a defense of bs opinions on the internet

              • Olhonestjim@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                7 hours ago

                It probably means different things for different people, because like every other fandom, it’s kinda arbitrary.

                I was kind of purist. I started with TOS, but TNG, DS9, and VOY were right then too. Didn’t care as much for Voyager, but it was ok. Skipped Enterprise completely. I have TAS but haven’t watched it. Actively disliked the Kelvin movies. I’ve missed all the new stuff because I don’t stream, except Lower Decks, which I find delightful. I’m gonna pick up Picard and SNW soon.

              • NiHaDuncan@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                7 days ago

                I guess you missed the part where he quoted the exact part of your comment that he was replying to. Or do you just want to ignore that part so you don’t have to defend it?

                • atomic@programming.dev
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  7 days ago

                  you mean like they ignored the part of me asking what a “star trek purist” is? maybe you can shed some light on that.

              • ameancow@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                7 days ago

                My actual response to someone so cynical and unable to relax and banter about hobbies and fandoms is to block them. Bye.

    • ameancow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 days ago

      I agree, but after spending some time here, it’s amazing how sensitive the people are about their fandoms on these more niche communities. Like guys, come on… it’s just entertainment, you’re allowed to have opinions, not everything should make you feel so stressed.

      At least in larger sites like reddit people can have lighthearted spats and debates about silly things like media. Some of the folks here really need some sunlight.

  • PhobosAnomaly@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    8 days ago

    It’s quite simple really.

    Are you planning on a sensible night with a few tinnies? 4.

    Are you wanting to get wankered but still make sense by lunchtime tomorrow? 14.

    Are you wanting to get utterly trashed and wake up the morning after the morning after? 24.

    Are you part of a suicide cult? Yeah go with 104, sure whatever.

  • UnfortunateShort@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    8 days ago

    I’m not sure whether that’s a hot take, and I know there are different levels of tolerance, but I think you might have a problem if you drink 20 beers in 2-3 days (assuming 4-6% alcohol). Or at least you will probably have, starting day 2 :D

    • CrazyLikeGollum@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      Assuming 12oz beers at 5% ABV, that you’re a man at the global average weight of 180lbs, and have a healthy liver, if you paced yourself to 1 beer every 1.5 hours over the course of your 16 waking hours per day, your BAC would never exceed 0.02, you’d have 5-10 minutes between beers with a BAC of 0, and you’d drink about 12 beers in a day.

      Most people would not be noticeably intoxicated by this and probably wouldn’t experience any kind of hangover. They might wind up a bit dehydrated if that’s the only thing they drink. It’s also definitely not advisable to do that over any extended period of time.

    • TipsyMcGee@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      7 days ago

      I mean, if you’re doing a full weekend of activities with friends those beers could be spaced out far enough that you’re never more than slightly buzzed (small cans, <5%ABV). But yeah, if it’s a regular thing, it’s not a great look.

    • Nalivai@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 days ago

      There is a big difference if it’s a periodic activity or a one time party thing. If it’s a one time one, it’s not a big deal, apart from heavy hangover afterwards.

    • Tabula_stercore@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      20 beers

      There’s no volume stated here… is 1 beer a pint, 0.5 liters, small bottle/can of .33 liters, 2 liter bottle.

      If it’s the the small bottle it’s not that much

        • Dasus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          7 days ago

          0.33 in Nordics. Then also 0.4, common bar serving, and 0.5l can and full pint, 0.568l cans.

          But “a beer” in the Nordics would generally be 0.33 from a can and 0.4l from a tap

            • Dasus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              7 days ago

              Yup. It is indeed. I just wanted to add info.

              Sometimes I seem sodas in 0.355 cans, mostly red bull. Somewhat uncommon size here imo, and I’m just wondering where theyre used. 0.355 seems like a US size, but the bottles I got from Germany were mostly 0.33l aa well. Although the cans were like 0.6l

              Just wondering how prevalent and mismatched the standards are

              • bitjunkie@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 days ago

                355mL is 12 fl oz in Freedom Units™, and is the most common soda/beer size in the US. Red Bull and other such energy drinks tend to come in a smaller form factor, oddly enough.

                • Dasus@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  6 days ago

                  Yeah there’s 250ml Red Bull, which is the most common one, but then theres a larger version here which goes to 355 and I think even larger, a 473ml one.

                  But yeah the tiny 250 is the most common

    • Dasus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      I remember watching the X-files sometimes in the noughties and Mulder came up with a deduction; “it must’ve been two men…nobody drinks two six-packs alone” and I just cracked up.

      12-pack was like a medium for the night, 24 a heavier. Plus bars usually. (Finn here.)

  • Xulai@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    8 days ago

    I only upvoted for the Darmok reference and the actual photo still hasn’t loaded to see if the reference is valid.