• brucethemoose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    332
    ·
    edit-2
    11 days ago

    The pathological need to find something to use LLMs for is so bizzare.

    It’s like the opposite of classic ML, relatively tiny special purpose models trained for something critical, out of desperation, because it just can’t be done well conventionally.

    But this:

    AI-enhanced tab groups. Powered by a local AI model, these groups identify related tabs and suggest names for them. There is even a “Suggest more tabs for group” button that users can click to get recommendations.

    Take out the word AI.

    Enhanced tab groups. Powered by a local algorithm, these groups identify related tabs and suggest names for them. There is even a “Suggest more tabs for group” button that users can click to get recommendations.

    If this feature took, say, a gigabyte of RAM and a bunch of CPU, it would be laughed out. But somehow it ships because it has the word AI in it? That makes no sense.

    I am a massive local LLM advocate. I like “generative” ML, within reason and ethics. But this is just stupid.

    • DaddleDew@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      160
      ·
      11 days ago

      When I’m browsing around with multiple tabs open, the last thing I want is something to start moving them around and messing my flow up. This is a solution looking for a problem.

    • acosmichippo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      11 days ago

      even without AI, to me tab groups are already feature creep bloat in browsers. do people really put that much effort into organizing tabs?

      • JackbyDev@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        11 days ago

        No, but I think the idea of a second layer of organization to tabs is a wonderful idea. Maybe not a gig of RAM to sort them, sure.

      • Digitalprimate@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 days ago

        For work at any given point I have 17-20 tabs open. It’s totally useful for me to sort them into tabs to cut out the “noise” when I’m doing research.

      • cley_faye@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 days ago

        It is to some people. My approach though, when I happen to have multiple “work group” to organize, is just to use my OS ability to have multiple windows. No need for any extra bloat, the feature is already there, and it works as I’m used to.

        But apparently, using the tools already available to you is not a common skill these days :(

        • amorpheus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 days ago

          But apparently, using the tools already available to you is not a common skill these days :(

          So, are you not understanding that other people work differently, or are you just not using that skill?

          Besides offering different approaches for different preferences, there are clear benefits to the extra level of organization. As an additional exercise, try to picture someone using multiple windows and tab groups.

          Not everyone operates on the basic level. Hell, why even have tabs? The OS can manage multiple windows, and you can use multiple desktops to achieve the same result without that bloat.

          • cley_faye@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 days ago

            So, are you not understanding that other people work differently, or are you just not using that skill?

            The very first five words of my message was that this was useful to some people.