• Defaced@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Anyone with half a brain could see this coming from a mile away. My conspiracy brain almost thinks this is some concerted and calculated effort by Microsoft to artificially lock games to Windows through anti cheat. It’s disgusting, isn’t needed, and just plain isn’t effective. They can spew all the metrics out of their ass, we all know that it’s just not effective.

  • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    4 hours ago

    at this point i just wanna cheat the hell out of these crappy games out of spite.

  • lorty@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Your anti-cheat doesn’t work anyway so let me play in linux you cowards.

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    15 hours ago

    Pretty much the same as all the other modern BFs. They all had cheats in the Beta/early release versions. I’ve played and own literally every BF game since the original release of 1942. Cheats have always been present more or less.

  • renrenPDX@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    18 hours ago

    I only found out about this today from someone whose computer got bricked from trying to enable secure boot.

    • Narwhalrus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      My machine went into a boot loop and I had to clear CMOS to boot again.

      I wonder how many people without the resources to fix a problem like that easily are going to end up without computers for an extended period of time because of this.

  • PushButton@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    21 hours ago

    So you got the spyware without the benefits, that’s a hell of a surprise isn’t it?

    But thank you for your money suckers!

    • massi1008@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      11 hours ago

      That’s an (obviously) unpopular opinion around here but I’ll give you the benefit of the doubt: How would AI be able to do that?

      • Stovetop@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        10 hours ago

        I am not sure what the user above is thinking, but to play devil’s advocate:

        One thing that modern AI does well is pattern recognition. An AI trained on player behavior, from beginner level all the way up to professional play, would be able to acquire a thorough understanding of what human performance looks like (which is something that games have been developing for a long time now, to try to have bots more accurately simulate player behavior).

        I remember someone setting up their own litmus test using cheats in Tarkov where their main goal was just to observe the patterns of other players who are cheating. There are a lot of tells, a big one being reacting to other players who are obscured by walls. Another one could be the way in which aimbots immediately snap and lock on to headshots.

        It could be possible to implement a system designed to flag players whose behavior is seen as too unlike normal humans, maybe cross-referencing with other metadata (account age/region/sudden performance anomalies/etc) to make a more educated determination about whether or not someone is likely cheating, without having to go into kernel-level spying or other privacy-invasive methods.

        But then…this method runs the risk of eventually being outmatched by the model facilitating it: an AI trained on professional human behavior that can accurately simulate human input and behave like a high performing player, without requiring the same tools a human needs to cheat.

        • zqps@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Cheating humans already perform closely enough to trick such a system. Many cheaters are smart enough to use an aimbot only for a split-second to nail the flick. With a tiny bit of random offset, those inputs indistinguishable from a high-skill player.

      • /home/pineapplelover@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        10 hours ago

        CSGO used to have Overwatch which is an anti cheat system that uses trusted and experienced players to go through video footage of reported players. With this method I both reported blatant spinbotters, wall hacking, and other chears. I also was on the side of watching back footage of hacking players.

        Say AI trains on this data, it might work.

        I’m not a fan of this though because knowledgeable and experienced players will be better than AI.

      • bluesheep@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Don’t waste your time, they’re either an hardcore AI bootlicker or a shit stirrer - most likely both, looking at their post history.

  • shiroininja@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    23 hours ago

    So I can’t play battlefield without TPM? I hate tech these days. My Ryzen board doesnt have it. Hence why I’m not on windows 11

  • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    69
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    I am still baffled that anyone thinks that Kernel AC is any kind of effective at stopping hacks, people have been literally making a living off of defeating it, and selling those hacks / methods for almost a decade now…

    But nope, still got hordes of idiot gamers who think they work, think they’re necessary, think they can’t be spoofed.

    • Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      7 hours ago

      It’s crazy to me that people cheat in online games. You really have to be a huge fucking loser to do this.

      Small pp energy.

      • Burninator05@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Indirectly buyers are making a decision on anticheat. If someone buys a game with anticheat, they’ve made the decision to reward the developer for making the decision to include anticheat.

      • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        edit-2
        18 hours ago

        Not sure how you could read this and come away with the idea that I do believe that…

        I am talking about the subset of gamers that go on internet forums and discord servers and make false, unsupported claims as to the effectiveness or necessity or Kernel AC over other forms of AC, tell people this just is how it is now, get with the program, eat the bugs, play the spyware game, its fine, everyone is doing it.

  • Kyrgizion@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    82
    ·
    1 day ago

    I love the Battlefield series but I’m not turning on Secure Boot for them. If it remains a hard requirement, I’ll simply be passing altogether.

    • Katana314@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      1 day ago

      I was able to get around secure boot by installing the beta on my PS5. From then, I had the pleasure of being unable to enter due to broken menus! Can’t complain for having spent nothing and having little trust in the franchise.

    • PHLAK@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      There’s nothing wrong with Secure Boot and enabling it can prevent a small subset of attack vectors with no real downsides. That being said, the things Secure Boot does protect against aren’t likely to be an issue for most users but it’s nothing to be afraid of.

      • pathief@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        1 day ago

        If you want to install Linux, secure boot limits the distributions you can use. If you don’t then it’s whatever.