• zeca@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Im also a gun vegan, a car vegan, a facebook vegan, an exercise vegan (unfortunately), a windows vegan, … just not actual vegan.

    I feel like thats a bad way to use the word vegan.

    • hex@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Yeah… It’s just abstaining from something. Veganism didn’t invent that. Dumb headline

  • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    People who use the term “vegan” for somebody they consider extremist, ascetic, or annoying are really telling on themselves.

    Side note: one of the most genius rebrands of all time was the way fake leather (which is often made from polyurethane, a type of plastic) suddenly became aspirational “vegan leather”.

    Most vegan leathers are made from compostable materials, because (surprise, surprise!) many vegans are also environmentalists.

    • zeca@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Also too ambiguous of a term, could also mean an ai chatbot that pretends to be a vegan person.

    • zeca@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Yes, it sounds like marginalizing normal reasonable people.

  • Rose@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    16 hours ago

    This makes about as much sense as calling Linux users “Windows vegans”.

    Choosing to not use AI isn’t some wacky contrarian position, it’s a tame position that can easily be justified. (Don’t want to use AI? Then don’t.) If anything, trying to assert that constantly using AI for everything would be the new normal is the wacky position.

  • raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    15 hours ago

    The better term would be “LLM gobbling fuckheads” for those who use that stuff and believe it has anything to do with “AI”

  • udon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    17 hours ago

    “refuse” lol as if there were a general requirement to use this shit

  • Allemaniac@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    18 hours ago

    “AI vegans”? I knew guardian was already bought by tech bros, but wtf is that phrasing lmao I dont use AI either, simply because it is wrong more often than not and I am still capable of googling myself, but being cautious equals to being vegan in tech bro eyes?

    • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I don’t agree with the framing, either, but they’re drawing parallels between people not using something due to a principled moral stance. (As well as some not-so-subtle implication that these people are holier-than-thou, too.)