• yoshisaur@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    111
    ·
    9 days ago

    The amount of bootlickers I’m starting to see in Nintendo’s YouTube comments is pathetic

    • mlg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      8 days ago

      Pay to use hardware button that offers 10 FPS pre-skype era fidelity is totally a good thing to show off, and Nintendo has totally never been the only company to notoriously harass, litigate, and shutdown mods, tournaments, homebrew. emulators, fan projects, and literally anyone who so much as so glances at their Intellectual Property.

      Utterly delusional

      • Maalus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        It’s funny you guys think these are actual fans and not bots bought through a marketing campaign

  • Tudsamfa@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    I will admit: I’m in this picture.

    Game developers have to eat, too, so a (!) price hike at some point was expected, the price for AAA games was set to 60$ before smart phones existed. They only stayed at 60 so long because gaming got much more popular in that time, driving sales. IF (!) this increase would allow developers to pay their employees more and eliminated the crunch culture, I’d have no problem with it.

    But we know this is just corporate greed. Pay extra to own your game physically, pay extra to play your old games, join our subscription program. Oh, you’re in Europe and your wages kept up with inflation? Forget the 33%, you can afford a 50% price increase instead.

    With the Japanese-only model being the singular exception, you’d think the direct was lead by 3 new faces just so Nintendo could put the blame on them when the thing doesn’t sell well due to the price.

    Oh, and Skull and Bones was dog shit, of course everyone hated it’s ludicrous price point.

    • WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 days ago

      With the more robust tools developers have available now and the reduced need for optimization due to more powerful hardware games should be cheaper to produce, not more expensive. Especially if you use a cartoon art style like most Nintendo games.

    • Shardikprime@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      Not only that, Ubisoft is actually the only one so far who has spent more money a full legal team to go against anyone who dares to do a honest review of their latest pile of dogshit, namely, ACS, than they spent in the development of the game itself

  • gmtom@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    8 days ago

    Oh just wait until Nintendo shits out another half baked pokemon game that looks like a student project from 2005 and watch all the man children that think being obsessed with pokemon is a personality triat pay $90 for that shit.

  • accideath@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    9 days ago

    Eh, there‘s some truth to either one. Game development is expensive and pricing hasn’t kept up with inflation ($60 in 2010 are almost $90 today). But also, games are ridiculously expensive at full price, especially in todays economy and especially if they’re as badly received as Skull and Bones, while Nintendo games are at the very least usually pretty decent.

    I’d recommend voting with your wallet and only buying games on sale or used. Just wait a little. (Or pirate them, if you can live with not supporting the developers at all).

    • Sludgeyy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 days ago

      “games are ridiculously expensive at full price”

      A board game with paper and plastic pieces can range from 12-45 dollars

      People will go spend $20 at the movies for 1 night

      Hell I’ll pay 100 if it’s a good game

      I have 1200 hours in Overwatch. $60 (free now). I have paid 5 cents per hour to play it. I am completely happy with my purchase even though it’s free now.

      If the game isn’t worth it, don’t get it. But to complain about it is ridiculous.

      Some N64 games were $50-$60 dollars back in the 90’s

      I feel like we are fortunate

      • Devmapall@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 days ago

        I agree with this. I have quite a few games I paid 60 dollars for that per hour entertainment makes it insanely cheap. Smaller cheaper indie games are even cheaper per hour.

        It does suck though paying full price for something that will not fulfill that. I bought star wars outlaws or whatever for half price. I knew it wasn’t good but man it was worse than I expected. Not with the price to me even though I probably played 10 hours or so. I read some reviews but I should’ve read more.

        • Sludgeyy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          I think a lot of the problem is that they cheap out to maximize profit.

          They could spend 1 million dollars and make a decent game for $70.

          Or

          They could spend 2 million and make an amazing game for $140.

          But the price of the video game has been locked around 60-70 for years.

          Even if you made star wars outlaws just a little better it’s not going to sell that much more.

          Looks like it’s already at least 50% off

          You can’t spend 2 million, sell for $70, then expect your game to go on sale anytime soon.

          Spending 1 million, and selling a ton at $70 or even $35. Turns a profit.

          TL;DR: We’d get better games if we were willing to spend more

      • accideath@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 days ago

        Yea, I don’t generally disagree. Especially if you‘re someone who plays games for hundreds of hours, instead of dozens.

        But $100 is still a lot of money for a lot of people. I‘d have to save up for months for that (I’m a trainee and have less than 1000€ per month for rent, food, internet, gas, etc.), so I rather wait until I can get games cheaper.

  • F_OFF_Reddit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    8 days ago

    Keep consuming and keep the enshitification machine working, you control everything around you with your wallet and your attention.

    These companions took ahold of both and now you’re a slave.

    • Suite404@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      A bit of an exaggeration. Your wallet speaks, sure. But I haven’t been to a lot of places in years, some even for decades and they’re still doing just fine. I didn’t buy any Nintendo console from the NES until I got a Wii paying half with a friend.

  • Shardikprime@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    8 days ago

    Yes but consider:

    A: Nintendo games are actually good, not a pile of crap

    B: It is actually true that games have not been keeping up with inflation. Is the same reason why GTA 6 is waiting for launch. They really want to sell that shit at 100 USD or more

  • pjwestin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    I’m a big Nintendo apologist. I’ve argued in the past that their consoles are the only ones worth buying over a gaming PC (not including Steamdeck there), and while I have never defend their terrible IP practices, I have been willing to overlook it and continue buying their products. This shit is indefensible. The price hike would be bad enough, but killing off physical games is a disgrace. Nintendo fans should be angrier than everyone else, not defending this shit.

  • Sanctus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    9 days ago

    This isnt really on topic but what we wanted was a more realistic Sea of Thieves and Skull and Bones was like ship arena battles, it was bad.

  • Owl@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    9 days ago

    sure, but that doesnt even mention the difference in quality and value that the pile of dogshit “pirate game” has compared to the latest innovative mario kart.

    • mlg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      8 days ago

      latest innovative mario kart.

      This is literally the Cars videogame but with Nintetendo IP and Nintendo Proprietary TCP pos p2p online multiplayer.

      I used to play that game for free with my friends at the local library 2 decades ago.

    • big_slap@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 days ago

      unpopular opinion: the quality of Nintendo games are worth the cost of admission, and they know it. there are very few bad nintendo games.

      super hype to play the new Mario kart for years like I did with 8

  • Ledericas@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 days ago

    Rs pulled this shit when they raised their pricing for subscription, everyone knows its greed. A fully online game shouldn’t be affected by inflation much