• DonutsRMeh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    28 days ago

    I smell something fishy going on. I’ve been using the AUR for a long time and I’m now just hearing of malware?

    • Zikeji@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      53
      ·
      28 days ago

      There’s been malware in the past, not only that - AUR is user submitted. It’s in the name. They warn you to double check what you’re installing. It is functionally similar to running a random installer you found on GitHub.

      It seems like these instances are being intentionally blown out of proportion, but I don’t see what there is to gain by doing that.

      • kadu@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        40
        ·
        edit-2
        28 days ago

        It is functionally similar to running a random installer you found

        So basically how Windows users have been acquiring their software for the last 30 years.

      • DonutsRMeh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        28 days ago

        I don’t want to say stupid things, but I have so many theories. I check the shit out of a package before installing it. I even go to the GitHub page and make sure of things.

    • Shareni@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      28 days ago

      It’s an obvious vector for malware, arch by default doesn’t come with it, and users have been warned the entire time to check pkgbuild. There’s nothing fishy, it’s just that arch has enough users to be worth it to hit it.

    • storm@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      28 days ago

      I expect that with SteamOS being based on Arch there will be a bigger target on Arch for malware just from increased attention on the platform

        • Shareni@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          27 days ago

          Most maintainers are volunteers, but not all volunteers are maintainers…

          Besides the obvious non-package work, if you make a single pr for some random package and never again, you’re not a maintainer.

          The Nix ecosystem is developed by many volunteers and a few paid developers, maintaining one of the largest open source software distributions in the world.

          demanding work that we cannot expect to be done by volunteers indefinitely.

          https://nix.dev/contributing/how-to-contribute.html

          • iopq@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            26 days ago

            If you add yourself to the maintainer list in your PR you’re a maintainer, even if it’s a maintainer of a single package

  • Maragato@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    28 days ago

    Aur is probably the main reason why many people use Arch and derivatives. However, many users are unaware that aur is not an official Arch repository and that, as you say, you are the one who has to monitor the pkgbuilds of each installed aur package. Normally the most used aur packages tend to generate more confidence but that does not prevent that package to include malicious software in a version change and having root access to the system can take control of certain system services. That’s why I always recommend not using Aur and that’s why I’ve always found Manjaro to be a great distribution, as it retains packages for a few days to check them and discourages the use of aur. Any security measure is too little and that’s why any security tool you can configure is advisable. In a rolling distribution where new code is constantly entering the system, it is essential to have selinux and secureboot enabled.

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      28 days ago

      Aur is probably the main reason why many people use Arch and derivatives.

      FYI, non-Arch distros can use AUR with an Arch distrobox. So people shouldn’t be using Arch just for AUR.

      Being in a distrobox may or may not protect your system from potential malware, that I cannot say.

  • Kalcifer@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    28 days ago

    Is this post intended to be a sort of outcry around the idea that there’s a risk of malware being in the AUR?

  • odama626@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    28 days ago

    Was there for 2 days before it was caught and they would of had to be manually installed?

    I think that’s much safer than any other platform I’ve heard of

    • Sips'@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      27 days ago

      As someone not too familiar with arch and not undertanding the full context, could you elaborate on how Chatoitc AUR differs from AUR?

      • 𝔻𝔼𝕍𝕀𝕃𝕀𝕊ℍ@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        27 days ago

        TLDR EXPLANATION:
        Basically Chaotic AUR is just AUR that has been compiled so user doesn’t have to wait for a package to install.

        LONGER EXPLANATION:
        Chaotic-AUR is an unofficial package repository that provides pre-built packages from the Arch User Repository (AUR), allowing users to install software without building it from source. In contrast, the AUR requires users to compile packages themselves, offering a wider range of community-maintained software but requiring more technical knowledge and time.

        In contrast Chaotic AUR offered simpled way to install AUR packages, Chaotic AUR packages already cleaned from malware, spyware, etc so there’s no need to worry.