Collective shout seems to have expanded its scope: games like cult classic Fear And Hunger have been removed from Itch.io, while horror game VILE: Exhumed has been delisted from Steam just a week after launch.

    • Barbecue Cowboy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 days ago

      The people who would typically be expected to push back against collective shout also typically wouldn’t be expected to do anything effective whereas the people involved with collective shout are the type of people who give politicians money.

          • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            Right okay so steam are going to accept my positive vibes are they?

            Next time you decide to make a truly stupid comment, perhaps you could put some effort into it making some kind of coherent sense, otherwise you sound like an utter prat.

            • Sgarcnl@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              21 hours ago

              Mate, it just requires an address to transfer to. Nothing stopping an organisation like steam from making a wallet and accepting funds. This level of new inconvenience introduced might make it more appealing, not stupid.

  • raynethackery@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    I think there are probably some skeletons in the closets of Collective Shout’s members. It’s always projection with these people.

  • Kyrgizion@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    85
    ·
    5 days ago

    Man, I knew it was only a matter of time but I didn’t think it would be this bad, this soon.

    Fear & Hunger is a goddamn masterpiece. Yes, it has depictions of nonconsensual sexual acts. It’s in keeping with the lore of a world that is truly fucked even beyond our reality. It’s an integral part of the worldbuilding, and it is by no means glorified.

    • BreakerSwitch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      4 days ago

      Agreed. Fear and Hunger has it’s issues and I would not broadly recommend it to anyone. I would also say that the FREQUENCY of sexual assault in the game, and the presence of some weirdly sexual status effects like anal bleeding are a bit overboard. That being said, when one of the earliest enemies can sexually assault you, or maim your character in a way that leaves you able to keep playing, but effectively crippled, it really nails home not just that the world is dark, but that your assumptions about what is in the game don’t apply here. Anything could happen. REALLY anything. And exploring a harsh, hostile world with that expectation set is one of the best parts of the game, because it’s a unique experience that you just can’t get at that quality anywhere else.

  • Strider@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    3 days ago

    This will be fun 🍿.

    (before downvoting: don’t worry, this won’t go over well)

  • RunawayFixer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    4 days ago

    I don’t get why the gaming platforms are removing games instead of removing the objecting payment providers as a payment option for purchasing those particular games.

    If visa doesn’t want people to purchase game X with Visa, then remove Visa as payment option for buying game X.

    • otp@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 days ago

      I don’t get why the gaming platforms are removing games instead of removing the objecting payment providers as a payment option for purchasing those particular games.

      I think the issue isn’t that the payment providers don’t want to support the purchase of those games with their card. They want to stop offering their services to a platform that sells those games.

      • RunawayFixer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 days ago

        It appears that in the future, Itch will allow creators to opt out of payment providers, meaning that it’s probably on a per game basis, not per platform. That Itch and Steam are not making a per game solution now, is most likely because their current software doesn’t allow it and they need time to rework it. Itch has promised various changes already, Steam has been mum afaik.

        Source for Itch: “For NSFW pages, this will include a new step where creators must confirm that their content is allowable under the policies of the respective payment processors linked to their account.”. https://itch.io/updates/update-on-nsfw-content

        • otp@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          Interesting! Maybe it’s a similar situation on Steam, but the payment providers demanded the platforms act immediately (or at least too soon for them to make such changes).

          Or maybe Steam gets too many chargebacks on NSFW games and is ok with this? Lol

    • dustyData@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 days ago

      This is what Steam will probably do in the future, and Itch.io is already looking into it. There’s a reason all this garbage hasn’t splashed GOG. GOG is based in Europe, where protection laws would slap silly any financial entity trying to pull this stunt on an European company (pressure groups have weaseled censorship and moral panics with other strategies though, just not this one), and they have so many more payment processors that PayPal, Visa and MC would just be dropped entirely and immediately for any of the other dozen or so alternatives. The issue is that in the US and Australia, the three headed shit dragon already lobbied governments to pull the ladder behind them, so no other payment processor could take their place or compete with them, establishing a legal oligopoly of the old money finance club. They won and have this power due to systemic and political failures decades in the making.

    • sykaster@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      4 days ago

      You overestimate the adaptability of the average software stack. I worked at companies where even adding another button to the cart screen was a monumental undertaking

    • RunawayFixer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      I only use Steam myself, so I hadn’t checked Itch Io’s communication yet. I don’t know the platform myself so it’s quite possible that I’m misinterpreting this, but to me it appears that Itch Io will allow creators to delist payment options that they are not compliant with: “For NSFW pages, this will include a new step where creators must confirm that their content is allowable under the policies of the respective payment processors linked to their account.”.

      Source: https://itch.io/updates/update-on-nsfw-content

  • Shotgun_Alice@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    5 days ago

    Called it. Soon all we’ll only be able to play baby games like Elmo’s big adventure puzzle book land, or something like that.

    • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      5 days ago

      It’ll be some “evolution is the devil” creationism bullshit, because this is a Christian fascist movement.

    • unphazed@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 days ago

      Nah, most likely Veggie Tales. Elmo is too woke and might cause dissonance with supremacists and Christian Nationalists. Oh, wait. I just repeated myself - sorry.

    • FriskyDingo@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      Nah, we’ll still have our shooters and sports games, just not anything sexual (yucky), taboo or too outside of the ordinary.

  • ssillyssadass@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    5 days ago

    What I see is a new niche opening up for a website offering game sales through alternative payment processors.

  • GasMaskedLunatic@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    5 days ago

    Involving the MasterCard Mafia in your puritanical crusade is next to criminal. The only solution is to [CONTENT REMOVED FOR VIOLATING RESTRICTIONS AGAINST ADVOCATING VIOLENCE].

  • rottingleaf@lemmy.worldBanned
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Honestly horrors get old when you can read in the news about “respected people” calling to exterminate Gaza and build beachfront cottages there. Even from just reading that and knowing that the same people can put anything onto your Android devices via a Facebook update or any of the Google applications update, on a whim. Nobody will even know.

    About this - is it even legal to obey such pressure?

    EDIT: I mean, how is it different from banning sellers by skin color when racists complain, or by religion when Muslims complain (all Hindus are Satan worshipers, didntcha knaw), or whatever else.

    EDIT2: But it pains me to see how public offering was, in fact, an important part of market regulations, when everybody just ignores it without getting 9 lifetimes in jail for executives. I was against it at some point. That is - customer associations are important, and there are almost none, and when customer associations demand businesses to act like public offering, then it’s almost as good as if enforced, and no such regulation is a good stimulus for customer associations to keep existing. But - feels shitty when it’s in the law of most countries and hasn’t been removed.

  • curiousPJ@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    4 days ago

    Wow… This count have happened in the 2010’s with the anti-gaming feminist and conservative movement at the time.

    If only they knew to go after payment processors instead of identity groups.