• FizzyOrange@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    15 hours ago

    I can’t say I agree with this.

    AI writes shallow tests.

    It definitely did in the past. But not any more. It’s far better at writing tests than humans and I haven’t seen a single nonsense test out of Opus 5.5.

    AI writes overly complex ccode

    This one I will kind of give him. AI does seem to like being super paranoid - writing tons of checks for things that we don’t really need to check, and adding config flags for absolutely everything. You can just tell it not to do that though. Annoying that you have to, but it does work.

    Reliance on AI decreases human understanding

    Yes but does it matter? Does your manager understand the codebase? Does his manager?

    AI moves too quickly to maintain a high quality bar

    It’s too quick for thorough human code review definitely, but I don’t think that means you can’t have a high quality bar. There are other ways to ensure a high quality product. Traditional QA testing for example.

    • ExLisperA
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      15 hours ago

      AI writes overly complex ccode

      100%. It doesn’t have a concept of maintainability. If you tell it to do X it will happily rewrite half o the codebase to achieve it where a person would stop and look for alternative solution. I see this as the biggest issue with current models. They can implement anything but someone still needs to check if the solution makes sense. AI can’t tell.

  • raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    65
    ·
    2 days ago

    No shit Sherlock. Everyone with a functional brain knew that from the beginning. We also know that the word is license whitewashing by slop, not AI.

    Only morons think they can develop good software by using coding agents. And yes, that includes Torvalds, whose sanity is pretty much a goner.

    • douglasg14b@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      No, they didn’t, and your high horse view is just propagating the problem.

      Most developers that I’ve worked with will build slop even without AI.

      They don’t recognize the quality issues with AI-generated code at all.

      • thedeadwalking4242@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        I’m down voting you but I agree. Most people did produce slop before. Those people copy and pasting from stack overflow where not joking

        • douglasg14b@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          21 hours ago

          I’m confused. Why are you downvoting me? Do you think that my comment is not contributing to our discussion?

          That seems unlikely given that you’re replying to me.