inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · 5 days agoTrump's Drooping Face Draws Questions and Alarmwww.distractify.comexternal-linkmessage-square65linkfedilinkarrow-up1312file-text
arrow-up1312external-linkTrump's Drooping Face Draws Questions and Alarmwww.distractify.cominclementimmigrant@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · 5 days agomessage-square65linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squareExLisperAlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-24 days agoWho in the party supported Trump during his first campaign? The whole party was against him. Until he won. (edit: technically his second campaign)
minus-squareMJKee9@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·4 days agoIt’s not the “party” that matters… It’s who is giving money to the party. Sometimes it takes a minute for the donors to settle on the same horse.
minus-squareExLisperAlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·4 days agoAnd last time they settled on Trump who didn’t have any support inside the party. So what makes you think they can’t settle on MTG now? Clearly they don’t look on how many committees someone is sitting.
minus-squareprole@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-24 days agoThe question is whether or not the base will follow. Trump may have been a singular phenomenon. Probably wishful thinking though.
Who in the party supported Trump during his first campaign? The whole party was against him. Until he won.
(edit: technically his second campaign)
It’s not the “party” that matters… It’s who is giving money to the party. Sometimes it takes a minute for the donors to settle on the same horse.
And last time they settled on Trump who didn’t have any support inside the party. So what makes you think they can’t settle on MTG now? Clearly they don’t look on how many committees someone is sitting.
The question is whether or not the base will follow. Trump may have been a singular phenomenon.
Probably wishful thinking though.