Um, you just add a door to the bathroom if it doesn’t have one. Then you put a lock on it, and a new sign. Very easy to do.

Wow, I have never heard of that, but interesting idea!

Bathrooms just need to be single person use. Then neither side could complain. Who wants to go to the bathroom with other people anyway?

There was one here. I think I saw like maybe 8 people there.

I’m sure many of them numb themselves to it, and pretend it isn’t real in order to do the job. Then unfortunately, I’m sure some of them get addicted themselves.

Similar to undercover cops who do drugs while undercover, then get addicted to the drugs.

Yeah, I think both religion and science have taken a back seat to just plain ol’ greed and power.

Well, religion is based on faith and history (but at a certain point falls back on faith since you aren’t there in the past), and science should be based on empirical evidence. So both realms can’t operate exactly the same, although they can cross over.

Many people do research on many faiths, and their research convinces them that a particular one is correct. They can live the rest of their life believing that particular faith is correct, and stick with it, even if they are open to being proven wrong.

And with science, if you actually prove something true, you do not have to act as though you have not. Now, if you only have a theory, then yes, you should be questioning it until it can be proven. I think modern science has disregarded the scientific method as not required anymore to make claims about what we “know”.

Yeah, there are also Christian scientists who do lots of research and studies and come to the conclusion that the earth is less than 10,000 years old. Because they challenge modern science with valid questions that get ignored, they are considered quacks. Like why you can listen to 20 different scientists who are all respected in the field, and get 20 vastly different answers on how old the earth is. You don’t come up with 20 different answers (as though they are truth) by using the scientific method. Which would have to mean at least 19 of them are only guessing.

lol, actually, good science would be on the left side of the image, at least after giving an answer to a question. Good science will actually prove something, then give the answer, then have no reason to continue to find another answer for it (whatever the issue is.) If you are giving a different answer year after year (like say for the age of the earth), then aren’t you admitting that so far you haven’t known the answer?

Only thing I’d say about the christian scientists who say the earth is billions of years old, is that they’d have to deny the scriptures of their faith in order to believe that. Seems like an odd thing to do. Either they really believe it and not what their faith (religion) teaches, or they just want acceptance from non Christians.

I guess in the end, if you are on the right side of the image, (in the religious or science realm), maybe you should consider the other sides arguments. Maybe its just that they actually figured out the answer and have no need to continue searching. Maybe they don’t have the answer, maybe they do.

This isn’t true at all. It all depends on the person. People could fit into:

Religion - I know everything. Religion - I don’t know enough. Science - I know everything. Science - I don’t know enough.

You know, some people even love both religion and science!

I just find it better, to do a little research on formulas, and figuring it out yourself. You’ll become better at spreadsheets. I’d have to try it though, it would depend on the actual implementation of it.

Exactly.

Microsoft Office is adding in AI? Spreadsheets can take a lot of work to create, I can just imaging an AI tool going in the messing one little thing up, and it being near impossible to find the error. Or not even know your calculations aren’t being done the way you want.

From the article, sounds like they would only be using money made from the sale of the gold they already have. Basically, not spending any extra money, and in the end, just converting some gold to bitcoin. I’m not sure how the sale of gold certificates work.

This line in the article made it sound like it already exists:

“This move, according to Hines, could be a budget-neutral way to increase the country’s Bitcoin reserves.”

The US has a bitcoin reserve? First I’ve heard of it. Whatever, but using gold to buy it makes no sense.

No I am not, I’m knowledgeable of how Nazis today act.

Me.

What in the constitution has been dismantled?

Yep, I just can’t buy that its legit.

But it is not a truth yet. Maybe it was, but its still possible it wasn’t. All I can say is that time will tell.