I show you where to look, you could refuse to do so It’s okay to be coward, but don’t show off.

• Barkane bombing civilian, enforcing dictatorship
• Military intelligence giving intel to let Egyptian bomb civilian coming from Palestine
• Caesar canon used to bomb civilian in Yemen
• Village mobilize against ore extraction in Tchad bombed by french air force
• Allowing weapon during kanak mobilization, to let colon armed themselves, and covering them when they kill, and deporting kanak that want the peace treaty to be respected

All this event took place recently, and we just scratching the surface because it took time to investigate, specially when it’s covered by the state confidentiality

do know what “the french” is. However, the french state is like leader in overthrow government :

• https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Barracuda
• https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opération_Bison (attempt)
• https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opération_Tacaud (counter insurgency)
• https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Épervier (defend a dictotar)
• https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Manta (defend the same dictotar)
• https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Azalee
• https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1991_Zaire_unrest#September_unrest_and_French-Belgian_interventions (counter insurgency)
• https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opération_Licorne (counter insurgency)
• https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opération_Lamantin (counter self-governance)
• https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opération_Turquoise (allow a genocide)

I just dig in the article “françafrique” of wikipedia. It does not cover economic interventionism on domination, like through logistics or uranium extraction. For example a massive strike in Tchad has been counter by sending 2 billions euro to the dictator in order to keep things running. At the same time, Macron was whining to get 2 the same amount for the healthcare. You could find a lot of things about this infamous state deeds on the website “survie”, and support their amazing work.

(notice that we didn’t speak of Algeria, Lybia, Indochina, Kanaky, and a lot of other event)

Bless It

so it’s possible, once

Well, according to your definition, Israel is not an ethnostate, neither Nazi-Germany. In both cases, other nationalities are tolerated but with less right (i.e tourism, forced labor). So I do not agree with this definition, even though their is a national supremacy.

I didn’t mix the citizenship and nationality on purpose. People are radicalized even with citizenship, and th upper-class could access to citizenship even without being assigned to a nationality.

Liberal capitalist states currently state that they ignore ethnicity in the makeup of their peoples, as long as they can help the nation in the international competition.

If I’m understanding this sentence correctly, you are saying that modern state could exist without discriminating people regarding of their ethnicity. That’s incorrect, but first we may be clarified some definitions : their is no scientific differences between nations, ethnicities or races. Those word define group of people with an arbitrary definition. However, nations is usually used for a recognized group (by law for example), and ethnicities is commonly used to define people see as “primal”.

Nations are social construct, usually based on genocide. Every modern state with a nation have disciminized, secregate or exterminate people who do not fit in the category of the national identity : gypsies, local minoritues, jews, …

Their is a specific history of nationality in germany (“volk”), however even in the most “liberal capitalist state”, the nationality is somewhat linked with a national identity, a parent, or a place of birth. The only place that came in my mind that may not have a “blood” related access to nationality is the UK. However this a rare case of multi-national state, with some other way of discriminate people based on their nationality (i.ethe Ireland)

Aren’t every modern state are ethnostate ? I They just call it “nationality”

Ecological, social, economic issues and the answer is on the legal site. FOSS as usual I guess

Both are translated “tortue” in french However to be fair, it could be specified “Tortue marine” and “Tortue terrestre”

"Without the fear of poverty, no one would be submissive "

Because a conclusion is incorrect do not imply that everything that lead to this conclusion is incorrect.

First, your obviously struggle to convince people. So even if this is the only objective, we have to inform ourselves better to understand what we are missing. This is a better stand, but I think this is still an issue : we don’t really listen people if we think they are wrong.

If our stand is right, this is not an issue to try to prove it wrong. So let’s discuss in order to be proven that vaccines shall not be trusted. I mean, with reliable sources and shit. However personal experiences are reliable sources, but not as much as collective one which and not as scientific consensus.

And their is some serious concerns about vaccines : in Africa, some vaccines campaign was used to use people as test-subject, Falashas has been collectively sterilized. Those are not exception, coloniale and oppressive context regularly use health to justify oppression (on race, gender, sexual orientation or origin).

So if we took what seems obvious to us in order to help, we may just reproduce what other people from the social origins use to oppress. In this conditions, the intuition to oppose to our speech is a good one. To do that, we have to value the knowledge of the exact same people that we may look down upon otherwise

because its hard to emancipated from authorities like parents and teacher. Finding other sources of information that seems to be reliable is hard. At this age I was relying on TV to do so. I don’t think I’m an exception

In this case, minorities could learn by themselves, to under another leadership.

Do you know some leading organization that are let concerned people speak, organized and plan their actions, without someone that want to “help them to understand their own conditions” ? I know some organizations dike that, and their are out of the limelight by others. And those others are liberal that think their have the right knowledge and their are need … or vanguard leftists that think they have the right political thinking to analyse the situation.

In both case, they are acting like missionaries (and are their are some historical and sociological link).

You take one example (that is true), but this is not enough. White people could act under the control of the collective; with an imperative mandate of what that person shall talk to, or what line shall that person defend, without asking his mind

Yeah, but remember this person could be 13

Yep. And that mean that everyone shall have the time and confort to rise a child. And then choose to do it or not. Fuck the bosses

yep, however this is antisemitic trop, not an antisionist one. The mem shall symbolize judaism accordingly with a hanoukkia, or a least with a golden maghen Dawid; the blue one in a nationalist symbol.

No you’re not paranoid. However, the point of surveillance is not to repress, but to make us afraid to act (panopticon and stuff). Not everything could be done through organization; but not system shift could be done without. A strong solidarity network is something that could people to act by other mean, help them to get inform on industries by people being exploited by those industries. And of course building international solidarity.

Depending of your country or your affinities, you could even join an union under a pseudonyme

we’ve got plenty of rich to eat

You may have heard of the Luddites; maybe you even heard of the Canuts. The truth is that the destruction of the machines by the workers is a very common thing among history. Sabotage and revolutionary syndicalism is a way. It will turn our inner eye to see our path. Where the bourgeoisie has gone there will be nothing. Only us will remain.