kutt

Don’t threaten us with a good time

That’s why you also buy off a high ranking dude so that no one questions the 20mins.

Guess it was debunked actually, but the source is fox news…

https://www.foxbusiness.com/features/jeffrey-epstein-was-said-to-be-a-witness-against-wall-street-a-fbn-investigation-suggests-otherwise

Didn’t he get it by snitching on some obscure corruption/money laundering story?

The Z-spot

I can imagine paying them off to let you go in that moment. The arresting officer could just tell his boss I’m sorry he escaped. Or you could pay to delay the investigation.

Then you just flee the US jurisdiction and they never get to see you again!!!

Some worked but the important ones didn’t. This one was the closest to recording the door, and is the one you’re referring to: New footage from the day he died with no cut before midnight

Your data is more valuable to them than water and energy

Very convenient indeed… and did I mention that the cameras didn’t work that day?

The answer is pretty simple actually. When he died, he had just been removed from suicide watch.

After six days, psychological staff removed Epstein from suicide watch following a psychiatric examination

Edit:

When Epstein was placed in the Security Housing Unit (SHU), the jail informed the Justice Department that he would have a cellmate and that a guard would look into the cell every 30 minutes. These procedures were not followed on the night he died.

Yes they will probably never replace them because they’re actually slower than classical computers in doing simple calculations.

Quantum ML is actively being researched. However I am not informed at all about the advancement in this field specifically.

But the good news is that it doesn’t need to be portable, we can use them just as we do right now with remote access!

Oh I’m not saying it is technically impossible, it’s the opposite actually, it’s developing extremely fast. And usefulness and having QCs in our homes aren’t that far apart to be honest. Why would John Doe have a QC at home if he’s not trying to create a new medication, or simulate a molecule? Probably for the same reasons he doesn’t have an MRI machine in his living room :)

Yeah but you have to consider one other thing. Before creating classical computers, we already had theorized them, we had algorithms etc. We knew why we were creating them.

For QC, the pace of hardware development is faster than our ability to create algorithms. It’s very similar to what’s happening with the AI bubble currently, we’re investing heavily in a new technology because it looks cool to investors, but we don’t even have enough algorithms to run on it. It’s just a shit ton of marketing…

I don’t think it will ever reach consumer households, since it requires extremely complex and expensive materials, tools and physical conditions. Unless a major breakthrough occurs but highly unlikely.

Also we don’t really have a use for them, at least to regular users. They won’t replace classical computers.

But you can already access some QCs online. IBM has a paid remote API for instance.

Or keep auto-upvote on because you agree with yourself. If you get proven wrong you can downvote your own post!

TIL you can sign NDAs for divorces