My preference is Holfood (Chocolate). Canadian company, produced in Toronto. It has a nice flavour and isn’t too filling.

Compared to other nutrition shakes I’ve tried in the past:

• Soylent powder and Holfood Vanilla are both very similar and taste very artificial. It’s not what I would call “bland”.
• Boost and Ensure: They’re always way too sweet (I would not be able to consume more than maybe 300 Calories worth in a day), and much more expensive than the alternatives when you consider the nutritional value.

And also having to check OS compatibility for every package you want to use.

Is this meant to answer the question, or is it just a tangential rant?

They could be conscious for all we know.

Expanding on that: until we can prove that another human being is conscious, it’s highly unlikely that we’ll be able to do so for a machine.

An example that comes to mind is mockery. People generally find mockery of behaviour/ideas that they find nonsensical to be funny. So if someone proposes that everything can be solved by a good guy with a gun, you can then mock the idea by proposing it for increasingly ridiculous scenarios.

I’d argue that both go against the spirit of the game.

You know different people have different tastes in food, right?

The ply count doesn’t reflect thickness or softness at all. Of the 3-ply toilet papers I’ve used at home, some need three layers to not fall apart on the first wipe, others are fine with a single sheet.

Not only does she got this, she’s being extra efficient by moving two pieces of furniture at once!

Isn’t freon one of the more efficient refrigerants we have? The environmental concerns aren’t a problem until it goes into a landfill.

For a lot of people, the answer is unfortunately survival.

Do you really need to say those magic words before you’re allowed to stay silent? You can’t just not answer their questions?

That’s a lot of money to spend on those two places.

Maybe if you can pay your rent or mortgage in cash, that’ll be enough to eat through a good chunk of it.

OP actually did write 0.10, but I think it’s pretty clear from context that they meant it with one sigfig.

So you tilt your hips down? That’s how you direct pee with a vulva.

Why does even-ness matter?

Because significant figures.

0.1 means you have a margin of error of ±0.05 (i.e. the true value is between 0.05 and 0.15).

0.08 means the margin of error is ±0.005 (i.e. the true value is between 0.075 and 0.085).

OP’s question can be rephrased as “how did we obtain a value to this level of precision?”

How does that happen? You point your dick straight down and the stream decides to shoot out at a 90 degree angle?

Real and honest in that they accurately reflect what’s going on in his own mind.

100 failures + temporarily borrowing someone else’s success also looks like 1 success from the outside.