deleted by creator

private investigation and security service firm

A PISS firm?

Makes sense, as all services I’ve encountered that mention age in regards to data collecting imply that it’s illegal to harvest those under 13. Mobile games and other services would not harvest data if you state your age as well below 13, but the increasingly vast majority just say “we will be harvesting you; by clicking this button or making an account you confirm that you are over 13 years of age…” Because, you know, real child protection laws are in effect.

Maybe, maybe not. I recently watched a mini-documentary featuring N64 Tetris tournaments at CTWC (The First Perfect Game of Tetris Just Happened) - this story is of a professional Tetris player who “beat” the game in 2023, aged 13.

“It’s over, Republikin! I have the high ground!”

At the cost of a less stable value, you can convert your currency to BTC, store it on a physical wallet like those made by Ledger and self-host BTCPay Server to make receiving money easier (alt cryptocurrency available via integrations). As for spending, that depends entirely on the recipient cooperating and accepting BTC. There are also ‘payment gateways’ that should help, including self-hosting a verifiable debit card. I’m still looking into it.

Conservatives and that Australian feminazi group are basically terrorists, their actions do nothing but harm the lifestyle of absolutely everyone, achieve nothing if not toxic control over vulnerable people, and divert valuable and finite resources from real issues.

deleted by creator

Broad censorship can die, but personal protection is a good thing, usually. Hopefully this leak didn’t result in much.

Putting knife crime and shoplifting in the same point is abhorrent

Yeah we need a long arse conversation about what a “violent offender” is. An offender of the UK law is obvious enough, although I would prefer offenders of humanist and ethical laws to be the focus. “Violent” in my opinion should only be used to refer to individuals who are a persistent danger to others, despite attempts to rehabilitate. For example, someone who defies state law to protect others in a way that isn’t harmful to anyone does not qualify as violent under the humanist law. Neither do individuals whose only claim to state legal scrutiny is their skin pigmentation.

1. The USA believe they are the world king.
2. The corporations of the USA believe they’re invincible.
3. The French rejected the American far-right propaganda group’s direct meddling in their politics.
4. If the French leadership was aligned with the USA’s, they wouldn’t investigate anything harmful to society anyway, as extreme right-leaning folk want a revolution against the civil freedoms that we’ve had over the past decades. Harm to this society is exactly what X wants.

So the Tutsis are one of three ethnic groups of Rwanda, and Radio Genocide (real name Radio Télévision Libre des Mille Collines (RTLM)) was a government-endorsed opinionated radio station in Rwanda. The broadcaster spread influential hate propaganda and was a major factor in leveraging the public opinion and causing a 1994 genocide against the Tutsis.

By listening to this broadcast, it’s likely that Tutsi folk were able to know when the destruction was on their doorstep, and when to run/hide/fight. Although my opinion is that fight is necessary long before the aggressors start to mass murder.