A white noise machine to fall asleep to.

You’re transgression has been noted. The gruvbox police will be over to collect four shortly for light theme crimes. /j

I’ll be honest I don’t even know vhat gruvbox is.

Sounds like you’re in your Face Mcshooty era

A man is called a pedophile. Said man then shoots someone in his near visibility. He has not distracted you from him being a pedophile, he’s just now a pedophile and an active shooter.

We should care about both these issues. Trump is a pedophile and a close friend of epsein. He is also wasting human life for a distraction and should be shamed for that as well.

If I’ve learned anything from realistic space fiction, it’s that they won’t find any up there.

No you don’t! You need a stable housing situation and a, like a group of like-minded individuals that you, you know, talk about stuff you’re passionate about with.

No you don’t! You need a stable housing situation and a, like a group of like-minded individuals that you, you know, talk about stuff you’re passionate about with. SHIIIT I replied to the wrong comment.

We talkin about this fella? https://spec-evo.fandom.com/wiki/Pterodeers

The vast standard is music ships with the artist’s name baked into the metadata. It’s watermarked that way, kept in the fringes of the data, away from the main piece, just like a signature on the fringes of the artpiece. This is not new, nearly every artist does it. That’s often why we can ID physical art centuries later, and it’s why you rarely ever stumble into a song file you can’t identify the artist of.

I give this one a singular “HA!”

Selling physical copies of an IP for profit. For example, tomb raider as an IP is owned by Embracer group, so they could potentially sue evercade for producing tomb raider cartridges.

Edit: the workaround they’re using seems to be just buying a license with said IP owners, so that solves the issue.

Disappointing that they don’t have the specs front and center.

Also seems like the cartridge system is prime for getting sued by companies.

States have governors, towns have mayors, and in anarchist theory none of those heirarchal positions would exist. Usually, heirarchies are formed in order to complete projects and those heirarchies are supposed to disappear once the project is complete. Can’t really have a state without a legislative body dictating it.

‘Basically no one in charge’ is not exactly correct. Heirarchies are allowed to exist, but ideally should be as brief and flat as possible.

My best understanding of the end-goal is an intermeshing alliance of small democratic collectives working together to provide for one another. This type of system has existed previously, such as with the various tribes across the Americas which often traded and collaborated with one another. In contrast with previous times, there is vastly more understanding of how the world works now, and thus many more possible projects to strive towards.

There is also no expectation of some supposed utopia from this, as i understand - conflicts are still expected to flair up every now and again. The main aim is for equality and the absence of a single constant power structure which oppresses and dictates the conditions of all, but instead that there is a democratic collaberation defining the conditions for folks involved.

The ethics which we use today evolved out of practical ethics - that is to say, it’s evolved out of a need for a set of rules meant to be applied in order dictate the conduct of humans amongst one another. Because of this, I think most ethical frames of reference are ill-suited for trying to answer this question soundly.

It seems analogous to trying to apply traditional physics to a quantum reference frame. It’s outside traditional Physics’s wheelhouse. A different set of tools likely needs to be applied, which has a different starting paradigm.

That being said, your answer is really going depend on what this new ethic’s paradigm is, which is arguably completely arbitrary in this specific case.

Most work accidents nowadays are one or two folks injured or killed. Previously it could be entire buildings’-worth of injuries in single incidents.

A term I’ve been using is ‘activation’. people who are in the early stages of activation attend protests - more often attendance is more activation. This eventually evolves into active participation in support networks, vigilante counteraction, or legal resistance like journalism and similar activities.

Protest attendance is the start of most individuals’ activation, and we can’t knock that starting place if we want greater numbers participating in the counteraction apparatus going forward.

It was maybe a month or two ago that an article showed that studies like these - all usually done as surveys - are highly susceptible to changes in input from users, just by word choice. In their example, they showed that if you use terms like ‘mental health’ while surveying people, a discrepancy emerges between non-conservatives and conservatives. This discrepancy disappears when you instead ask other questions, such as ones about sleep, worries , and fears.

So I don’t really know if I overall trust the data on happiness overall.

One method is writing the text in black, copy-pasting it, then taking copy down a font size and change its color. I am also pretty sure there’s a button click to add an outline.

That’s why it’s pascal’s mugging. You’re getting screwed for something that, statistically speaking, is a shot in the dark.