Hazel

They had Poly Bridge in the 70s?

That sounds a bit like borderline.

I’m nothing like a psychologist though, just a possibility :)

Seems like the prongs might get in the way, I’d opt for the tanto one but use it point-down I think.

That’s an Eypo not a Euro, clearly.

/s

Furry Po̊rn?

Yeah, it’s about phones because they changed established practice, but then why use a new word for what was established practice and not the ‘new’, phone-specific, practice of limiting app availability?

Before phones that was the only way to install apps though.

Maybe we should have a term for the inverse, like ‘wallgardening’, or ‘bootlocking’, or ‘corputing’, or ‘inshilling’? 🤔

I couldn’t stand Mint Cinnamon, it’s like Linux with all the worst parts of Windows =P

That’s what I was thinking! 😅 Lucky-ass birds 😤

Man I just kept reading it as ‘breaks’…

I need a break 😔

Feeling bad eating sweetened white bread and thinking gluten is the problem…

Auth/lib is very cringe 🫠

Hahaha, I think that might be it, thank you! 😂

I really feel like that’s a misrepresentation, though admittedly I don’t have the data to back it up. To say any theist believes any other theist from another denomination is delusional just seems absurdly reductive.

And maybe it didn’t come across in my other comment, but to think of faith as some ontological disagreement on which particular version of gods do or don’t exist I think misses the point entirely. Seems rather more like an epistemic disagreement on what we believe this transcendent power to be, which theists are in agreement on regarding its existence. Most theists don’t believe their religious texts to be literal anyways, it’s different stories about the same transcendent power, being religious doesn’t mean lacking any and all nuance or historical understanding. That hasn’t been my experience with religious people at least :)

Pretty sure the genders were swapped, and this guy was (supposedly) meeting a wild dolphin on a beach somewhere. It was a long time ago though =P

Well that faith is primarily based on the belief that there ought to be a god, in order to explain the world in all its beauty, complexity, anthropocentricity or something like that. It’s just that their particular variety of religion seems to them the most plausible description of what said deity might be like, which isn’t incompatible with other, less plausible and outdated, ideas of God existing. Even if the plausibility of one’s religious views can be brought into question, it doesn’t really address the presumed need for a deity to exist in order to explain the world for what it is.

I think that’s completely missing the point of people’s faith lmao.

I remember as a teen coming across this site where someone meticulously documented (might’ve been made up) their sexual relationship with a dolphin.

The internet was a wild, wonderful place.

I-is that not why we’re here? 🫣