• 0 Posts
  • 40 Comments
Joined 9 months ago
cake
Cake day: June 29th, 2025

help-circle

  • by your claim, the field can have any series of numbers, that there is no way to determine if it is accurate, and the law that this was done to appease is bad, as in not able to obtain its expected result. and so the data is useless.

    Yeah, so this tells me you have no clue what you’re actually talking about.

    You don’t even stop to think for a second that maybe some enterprise setting requires such fields. Maybe they have software that populates account information based on their HR systems’ data, auto-creating user accounts? Maybe they can find a DoB field useful? Zero clue, zero thought, just “I don’t use it, therefore it’s useless”.

    No point in continuing this discussion, I guess.









  • Ah, so what you meant to say is not “democracy is a joke” but rather: “people’s awareness of what’s going on is a joke”, I got it.

    They’re not voting on the same thing they voted just recently. “Chat control 1.0”, as it is sometimes called, was passed 6 years ago - it was the voluntary monitoring that vendors were allowed to do. That law has just ended. The conservatives want to extend it. This is the current vote.

    What they voted on a month ago was the “2.0” version, where monitoring would’ve been mandatory.



  • A username field isn’t for your real name, it’s for a username and it has always been for that. Stop being intentionally obtuse.

    I’m not talking about the “username” field.

    I’m talking about the “Full name”, or “User name”, or “Name” field in the OS - name depends on the language version and the OS itself. Stop being intentionally obtuse.

    What’s to stop them from using all of the required user fields and then running a background fingerprinting check and then using that fingerprint every single time you visit a site?

    What…?

    First of all: the OS username is not shared with the website.

    Secondly: websites already do fingerprinting, what are you talking about?

    People are defending this with such fervor, too

    Yeah, “stop overreacting” is such incredible fervour!

    but why would someone care so much about defending a date of birth field?

    I could not care less. I just find it weird that you guys panic about it so much, to the point of there being dozens of new systemd forks, just because a new optional field was added.


  • Are you saying that you’re putting your real name in the “user name” field? And feel that you have to?

    What’s the difference between inputting a bogus name or a nickname in the “user name” field and selecting 1970-01-01 as your DoB?

    You need some kind of username to converse to fellow engineers

    On your OS?? No, you don’t. You select a username on whatever system you pick for said comms, has nothing to do with the OS account’s “user name” field.