• PugJesus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Checks-and-balances rely on:

    1. Voter interest in civic participation

    2. Careerist politicians and bureaucrats

    If voters have no civic interest and prefer masturbatory prejudices to serious consideration of civic duty, and if ‘careerist’ politicians are given immense power and wealth for stepping aside (either by retirement or by simple non-action when in office) thus rendering self-castration of their office personally meaningless to their career path/personal fortunes, checks and balances don’t mean shit.

    All systems are reliant on a population’s willingness to obey and enforce their rules. We in the US, apparently, have very little appetite for that anymore.