• scarabic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Two state is simply a fantasy. We’re going to have one state, but this could take two paths:

    1. full unification and equality, access to religious sites, free movement, etc for all Jewish and Palestinian residents of Israel, including the territories.

    2. annihilation of one side, resulting in a single state

    Guess which one I’d prefer and which one we’re heading for.

    • Rat_in_a_hat@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      19 hours ago

      According to Carney, you’re an antisemite for even suggestion #1.

      So that shows you where this 2SS is heading.

      • scarabic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        18 hours ago

        I’m perfectly fine shrugging off rocks thrown by someone whose position is that they need a pure ethnostate. To me, that’s an entirely unacceptable POV to have in 2026 which is why they need to dress it up in dramatic accusations of antisemitism. It can’t stand on any basic merits.

        • Rat_in_a_hat@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          15 hours ago

          100% agree. And also agree that 1 secular and Democratic state with restitution for the victims of what is essentially a decades long holocaust is the only viable path forward.

          Carney basically said that Palestinians need to get along and live under a Zionist state. So his mindset doesn’t even register apartheid ethnostate status yet.

          And those are the proponents for the 2SS today.

  • Kalon@feddit.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    23 hours ago

    There is no two state solution. Its one apartheid state that is committing genocide against its people and should be putin its place for doing so.

  • SparroHawc@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    2 days ago

    Israel: “Okay there’s a Palestine. We declare war on Palestine. Oh look, our army’s already there. How convenient. We have annexed Palestine. They’re part of Israel now. You’re welcome.”

    • ms.lane@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      That will never* happen, Israel is openly hostile to the idea because there are more Palestinians than Israelis and it would throw off their elections.

      * Ben Gvir would see it happen - but only after they exile/murder all the Palestinians.

  • frongt@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    2 days ago

    A two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is critical for peace, stability and security in the Middle East and beyond.

    Bruh the two state solution is how we got here. As long as Israel’s claim is supported, they’ll be trying to expand.

  • Kyrias@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    2 days ago

    Strongly worded letters with their historically high success rates!

  • dudeface@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    2 days ago

    Would rather they tell Isreal they don’t own shit and need to integrate with the people that lived there before them

    • FiniteBanjo@feddit.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      Thats…

      what a two state solution is…

      unless you mean to say Israel should become a territory of Iran or something?

          • SparroHawc@piefed.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            2 days ago

            A two-state solution is separating Israel from Palestine. What dudeface is suggesting is that Israel simply stop murdering, oppressing, and otherwise being mean to the Palestinian people, and just be a nation that cares for all citizens within its borders. That is not a two-state solution because there would still only be one state - one that recognizes Palestinians as equal to any other people.

            • FiniteBanjo@feddit.online
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 days ago

              Thats problematic for two reasons:

              1. Israel decides who is and is not a citizen

              2. Israel considers itself an ethnostate which has so far never tolerated Muslims both within and around their borders.

              3. Let the user speak for themselves

              • SparroHawc@piefed.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                2 days ago

                This is why I specified

                one that recognizes Palestinians as equal to any other people.

                Yes, we know it’s not likely to happen, but that would be the preferred outcome.

              • dudeface@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 day ago

                It’s not problematic for me, I don’t care about them maintaining an ethnostate or considering themselves chosen

    • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yes, if we could all hold hands and sing “Imagine there’s no countries” everything will all be better.

      • Cethin@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        I have you tagged as a Zionist Troll, so I’m not putting much hope in this discussion. The point is, the two state solution would be used by Israel to continue expanding their territory. Pointing this out isn’t saying any alternative would be free from conflict. It’s saying letting Israel continue as it is will be a horrible situation. We should consider alternatives for this reason.

  • 0xDREADBEEF@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    the best time to declare a state is when its rubble I suppose. A state thats a tent city with no way of building infrastructure and will not receive the financial aid it will need because of Oct 7 (every centrist leader will use it as an excuse to not directly aid a state of palestine should it arise) is exactly why western leaders are “brave” enough to announce their two state positions: they’re giving 2 million palestinians a homeland with no future and get to pat each other on the back and take photos

    Jared Kushner and Saudi money is going to invest heavily into the reconstruction via the board of peace for the good of the palestinian people for sure…

      • sunsofold@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        When someone is telling him how great and wonderful and smart and clever and chosen-by-god and handsome and wise and legitimate and righteous and not criminally liable and wealthy they think he is?

  • redbrick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Just curious WTF are these two countries talking about other countries in isolation for? I mean do they have houses there?

    • FiniteBanjo@feddit.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      The world has kind of shyed away from genocide, apartheid, and such due to the many wars and other losses resulting from its mere presence. From WWII to the Straight of Hormuz, nothing good ever comes from it.