• Microw@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      44
      ·
      3 months ago

      Their CEO quit end of June without any reason stated. Sounds like he was the first one to get laid off.

        • CIA_chatbot@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          49
          ·
          3 months ago

          Most of these layoffs are VC groups pulling funding from gaming companies to shift to AI investments

          • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            3 months ago

            Yeah because they think that AI will make the games in the future.

            Have you seen AI make games they’re terrible. They objectively work but they’re not good games because AI has no creativity.

            • CIA_chatbot@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              3 months ago

              I doubt they even care, VCs are there for investment returns, they don’t give a shit about anything else

            • omarfw@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              Most of these VCs are funded by old boomers who will fall for any tech hype. LLMs are the most successful grift of all time.

            • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              the best I’ve seen are shitty clones of simple games like frogger or flappy bird - anything else is about as interactive as a slideshow or vaporware.

    • samc@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 months ago

      Its a british thing. If a company wants to lay off a large amount of employees, they have to go through a process called consultation. This obliges them to sit down with your trade union rep (if you have one) and tell them why your job is being cut.

      Not sure how much difference it makes in practice, but at the very least it guarantees a 40 day period between announcing redundancies and actually firing people.

  • whotookkarl@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    3 months ago

    Individuals get fired when they fuck up, companies layoff workers when they fuck up. Large scale layoffs are the outcome of poor planning and organization. You can’t predict markets completely, suppliers charge, etc which accounts for small # layoffs, but large, mass layoffs should be accompanied by replacing executives and leadership roles like board members first to prevent such poor management.

    • IronBird@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      it’s cheaper to hire in bulk and fire “low performers” or whatever than it is to put more effortinto hiring.

      and even then, tmk, it’s really only so common in amerikka because worker protections are practically non-existent. if it were more expensive to fire people…then maybe the corpos would plan/hire better

      • HerbGrower@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Would that be good though? How is a small company realistically going to test if someone is worth hiring or not.

        Oh yeah, have you got 10 years experience in the same role?

        • raze2012@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          How is a small company realistically going to test if someone is worth hiring or not.

          we got into this stupid market because we spent decades neglecting training. When you don’t train for what you need, you don’t get good at identifying what skills you really need in order to succeed.

          So this question is already too far gone. If someone has most skills but is missing one: train them for it. Even if the training is as informal as "give them a few weeks in a low stakes environment to work on less valuable (but less risky) work.

            • raze2012@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              3 months ago

              well that makes the hiring or trial process much easier, no? I don’t think the problem here is “I can’t tell if my employee gives a fuck”.

              And I can tell you that passion is not something lacking in the games industry.

  • RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    3 months ago

    Ah man, the layoffs are hitting the developers of hit 2013 game “Walking with Dinosaurs?” What is the world coming to??

  • SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 months ago

    Their games are probably not easy to make and definitely not cheap if you hire these famous actors. Sure they are not s-tier level of actors but they are definitely not cheap. I bet many of those actors can ask a higher pay than the games industry’s favorite called Troy Baker.

    Also the market for interactive movies probably isn’t mega huge either. Every interactive movie series they released was published by a different publisher. Doubt they were massive hits.

    • Jackal@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Based on what I’ve seen Directive 80211 didn’t seem to sell as well as their previous games, probably because they dropped the “Dark Pictures” stuff from it (or kept it hidden, as it were)… Hard to believe a single mis-step caused this but I’m not in the industry so take that with a pinch of salt.

      • Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        They’ve released a bunch of non-Dark Pictures games, The Quarry, Casting of Frank Stone and Little Nightmares 3 recentlyish.

  • lechekaflan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    Once again, this demonstrates just how volatile and uncertain it is to be having game development as a career path. Especially as venture capital and equity deciding the fates of companies they buy out.