laurenceOfSuburbia@lemmy.world to memes@lemmy.world · 15 days agoNumber on or number off which one do you prefer??lemmy.worldimagemessage-square223linkfedilinkarrow-up1695
arrow-up1695imageNumber on or number off which one do you prefer??lemmy.worldlaurenceOfSuburbia@lemmy.world to memes@lemmy.world · 15 days agomessage-square223linkfedilink
minus-squareSonotsugipaa@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up14·15 days agoCounter counter point: I want to know whether it’s at 90%, 75%, 60% or 45% without counting pixels
minus-squareSoggy@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·15 days agoCan you not just glance and see approximately? Can’t think visually, must convert to numerical?
minus-squareSaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up12·15 days agoYes, I must have the exact number. I need some certainty in the chaos of this universe.
minus-squareSonotsugipaa@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·14 days agoYes, if I give the screen a lil’ kiss with my eyelids I can probably see that the icon has 8 pixels in height instead of 11. That is not what I would call a “glance” though; I can, however, just glance and see approximately, by looking at the first digit of the number.
minus-squarePapaStevesy@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·14 days agoWhy glance and see approximately when you can glance and see exactly?
Counter counter point: I want to know whether it’s at 90%, 75%, 60% or 45% without counting pixels
Can you not just glance and see approximately? Can’t think visually, must convert to numerical?
Yes, I must have the exact number. I need some certainty in the chaos of this universe.
Yes, if I give the screen a lil’ kiss with my eyelids I can probably see that the icon has 8 pixels in height instead of 11.
That is not what I would call a “glance” though; I can, however, just glance and see approximately, by looking at the first digit of the number.
Why glance and see approximately when you can glance and see exactly?