• grandma@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    3 months ago

    It’s definitely not ok, but when treating the root cause will take decades if not centuries (which we absolutely should still do), perhaps it makes sense to look into treating the symptoms as well

    • Seth Taylor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Solar panels and air con are a good short-term solution for the symptoms

      And by short-term I mean my whole life

      • grandma@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Why? Won’t they just get to sell more fossil fuels to meet the electricity demand while politicians endlessly drag their feet on cheaper, renewable alternatives?

        EDIT: Oh you mean treating the root cause, yeah true

    • Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      There is no treatment for the root cause, lol either we continue to pump co2 into the atmosphere or we stop. Either way, temperature increase is locked in for roughly a century at this point. We lost the fight for a livable planet. The human extinction event continues

      • sparkyshocks@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        That’s not true. There is plenty of profit to be made with selling stuff that helps reduce energy use, selling energy that uses less fossil fuel (or produces less CO2), undercutting competition with more efficient methods, etc.

        The tech world talks a big game about disruption and making billions or even trillions from it. You don’t think there are people who want to make trillions disrupting fossil energy companies?