cm0002@infosec.pub to People Twitter@sh.itjust.works · 2 months agoStatisticians, is this true?infosec.pubimagemessage-square75linkfedilinkarrow-up1472
arrow-up1472imageStatisticians, is this true?infosec.pubcm0002@infosec.pub to People Twitter@sh.itjust.works · 2 months agomessage-square75linkfedilink
minus-squareprole@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up28·2 months agoI don’t think I will ever figure out the order to read these things. Just… Why? Wouldn’t you want it to be formatted in a way that’s immediately obvious what order to read them?
minus-squareAxolotl@feddit.itlinkfedilinkarrow-up6·2 months ago I used bluesky lately (which i guess uses the same format?) and it looks like so because we are viewing a reply(3) to a post (2) that cite another post (1)
I don’t think I will ever figure out the order to read these things.
Just… Why? Wouldn’t you want it to be formatted in a way that’s immediately obvious what order to read them?
I used bluesky lately (which i guess uses the same format?) and it looks like so because we are viewing a reply(3) to a post (2) that cite another post (1)
Thanks. I hate it.
So convenient.
Same