• Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    2 months ago

    Spoiler:"Is it good?

    No."

    I use Kagi but do agree with the three listed complaints about it. Overall happy with it, but would consider something like uruky if it was a high quality search. I welcome the competition and there’s plenty more room since the big boys keep getting worse.

    My workplace actually blocks the uruky site.

    • douglasg14b@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 months ago

      I accidentally went to Google for the first time in months and was wtf’ing over how many results are sponsored.

      The complaints about Kagi are valid, mostly, (there’s always that one guy that runs around complaining that Kagi uses Yandex). But damn I’ve gotten spoiled by the results and the ranking customization…

      • ComradePenguin@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        I am one of the people previously complaining about it. I decided to rethink it and changed my mind. It is not a big enough deal to avoid the service. I tried it for a couple of months, and was satisfied with the results.

        I really liked filtering results and boosting them.

        In the end I deciding it was not good enough to justify the price, so I ended up with Qwant as my daily driver going forward.

  • RmDebArc_5@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    2 months ago

    I tried searching for a random YouTuber, the fourth page was for images of their feet, 10/10 search engine

  • ComradePenguin@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    I like the initiative, but this is ridiculously bad. I searched for one of the biggest tech youtube channels:

    • ExLisperA
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Why not search for youtube channels on youtube instead?

      • ComradePenguin@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        If the purpose of finding content online is the purpose of a search engine, then it does not do a good enough job.

    • jürgen (sexy)@feddit.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      operating a search engine is expensive. ecosia finances their stuff with ads. qwant probably too? if uruky comes out big, being independently financed means they could participate in the qwant-ecosia index without risks.

    • pastermil@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I wish people reply directly to say how this is wrong instead of trying to downvote this to oblivion.

      Personally I find this hilarious, considering how true this is.

  • Soupbreaker@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    Who’s vetting these names? I mean what’s next, a Morgul search engine? I don’t want to be an Uruk-hai :(