cm0002@infosec.pub to People Twitter@sh.itjust.works · 3 months agoCapitaleftisminfosec.pubimagemessage-square162linkfedilinkarrow-up1476cross-posted to: politicalmemes@lemmy.world
arrow-up1476imageCapitaleftisminfosec.pubcm0002@infosec.pub to People Twitter@sh.itjust.works · 3 months agomessage-square162linkfedilinkcross-posted to: politicalmemes@lemmy.world
minus-squareMattBlackAlien@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up11·3 months agoYou can make a very good argument that it was Adam Smith, with Wealth of Nations.
minus-squareFishFace@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·3 months agoIt was influential, but capitalism had essentially already come about in a limited form.
minus-squaremindbleach@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up3·3 months agoAnd his stated goal was competitive markets forever, not absolute monarchy with more steps. People dunk on conservatives by quoting that book.
You can make a very good argument that it was Adam Smith, with Wealth of Nations.
It was influential, but capitalism had essentially already come about in a limited form.
And his stated goal was competitive markets forever, not absolute monarchy with more steps. People dunk on conservatives by quoting that book.