Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net to Microblog Memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agoPride monthslrpnk.netimagemessage-square113linkfedilinkarrow-up1544
arrow-up1544imagePride monthslrpnk.netTrack_Shovel@slrpnk.net to Microblog Memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square113linkfedilink
minus-squareJanx@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·2 months agoI don’t get it. If both of you would have made it at a slower speed, how does accelerating mean only the front vehicle now does?
minus-squarewhyNotSquirrel@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up14·2 months agosomething like: “Both of them could have make it at 40km/h but the Huy in front was driving at 30 km/h and just accelerated at 60km/h when they noticed the yellow light and only them made it on time”
minus-squarepirc_lover@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·2 months agoImplication is if they were going at the final speed they ended up at the whole time, both could have got through.
minus-squareSailorFuzz@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 months agoacceleration is just a change in velocity. Perhaps they meant a negative acceleration.
I don’t get it. If both of you would have made it at a slower speed, how does accelerating mean only the front vehicle now does?
something like: “Both of them could have make it at 40km/h but the Huy in front was driving at 30 km/h and just accelerated at 60km/h when they noticed the yellow light and only them made it on time”
Implication is if they were going at the final speed they ended up at the whole time, both could have got through.
acceleration is just a change in velocity. Perhaps they meant a negative acceleration.