• BackgrndNoize@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    2 months ago

    This is clearly a indoor Bazar with doors that lock on both ends, they leave them out cause it’s not technically outside and ain’t nobody breaking in to steal some books, shits heavy and probably doesn’t sell for all that much on the black market

  • ZeldaFreak@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    2 months ago

    Here people even “steal” books from public bookcases and sell them.

    For people who aren’t familiar, let me explain: These public bookcases are a weatherproof shelf, old phone booth or something in the streets. The concept is you can take any book and leave any book. There are no written rules and you can keep a book if you like or just read it and put it back. In recent years people started to scan the barcodes and checked what books they can sell. There is a debate going on if people should mark these books or not, so they can’t be sold.

    • Zenith@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Who tf is buying normal books from the local black market in 2025 is my real question here

  • GraniteM@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    We do this at a used book store. It’s books that we don’t think we can sell inside for whatever reason, and we put them on shelves outside. There’s a big awning so they don’t really get rained on unless it’s raining sideways. We sell them for a dime or a quarter, and there’s a slot for overnight drops in case people want to get books at night. Every morning there’s at least a couple of bucks from the previous day/night.

    We donate the proceeds to public radio, and over the years we’ve donated over $100,000.

  • SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 months ago

    Yeah but the vandal does vandalize. In my country there are tons of shitheads who like to see the world burn and destroy someone else property when nobody is around. Like in some neighborhoods in certain cities you can’t have a mini library in your front yard, since a certain type of teenager will ransack it and set the books on fire.

    • eskimofry@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      i do think you’re wrong, but I am not willing to spend time to prove it so yeah i agree with you.

  • Smoogs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    At one point you could get swaths of ebooks on pirate bay. Probably still could. With seeders. Soo…we know that’s not true.

    • eskimofry@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 months ago

      piracy is not the same as stealing. You having a copy of a bible as a PDF is fundamentally physically different from having a physical book.

      Publishers have perverted the concept of ownership by hiding the fact that there is no scarcity of digital items compared to physcial ones.

      • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        on the basis of semantics

        It’s not semantics when “stealing” results in the loss of the original by the owner while “copying” just results in a new one being created.

        TL;DR: ✨die mad✨

          • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            Too bad. Because it’s being redistributed through a third party, you aren’t even stealing a negligible amount of electricity, bandwidth, or CPU time from them. Damn, when you think about it, it’s just not “stealing” in any capacity, is it?

        • Platypus@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          That’s a semantic point. The truth is that artists deserve to be paid for their work. Whether you “copy” or “steal”, you’re getting the work without paying the creator. That’s fundamentally shitty behavior.

          • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            Okay, but I literally just expressed how they’re fundamentally, pragmatically different while you keep reaching for the word “semantics”. You can still disagree that it’s wrong to copy – that’s not what I’m trying to litigage. To call it only semantically different from stealing is asinine.