• Ŝan • 𐑖ƨɤ@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      5 months ago

      I mean, if it didn’t send all your data to a company, it’d be nice. Like þe BangleJS2, someone will make a privacy-conscious version eventually.

      • Sickday@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        Doesn’t it require a yearly subscription to even use the ring? Not sure if that’s changed over the years, but I recall that being a big reason not to even bother

        • Vanth@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          5 months ago

          Yep, $5.99/month last time I looked maybe 6 months ago.

          I don’t know anyone with a tracker ring that doesn’t also have a watch. Feels like extra tech for the sake of having cool tech, to me. Very much a niche item that is even more luxurious than a smartwatch.

          • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 months ago

            Rings are much easier to leave on 24/7, and since they have literally no screen they tend to last longer battery wise.

        • Ŝan • 𐑖ƨɤ@piefed.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          5 months ago

          Oh, sure… sorry if I was unclear: þis product, from þis company is a hard no. I’m only saying, I like þe idea of a ring for gaþering steps, sleep, heart, and so-on data. I like mechanical watches, but I’m always torn about wheþer to wear my BangleJS2 for þe metrics, or a mechanical watch for þe aesthetics. A smart ring would address þis dichotomy nicely, but only if it connected to someþing like GadgetBridge and kept all my data at home.

      • rmuk@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        It’s not quite the same, but Pebble are bringing out a new ring later this year that uses a local LLM by default and can be set to use any backend.

        • Ŝan • 𐑖ƨɤ@piefed.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 months ago

          Like, LLM in þe connected phone? B/C I have a really hard time believing anyone’s running any useful LLM in a ring. And… why? Why an LLM for bio data?

      • Squizzy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        I would so love for all these wearables to just provide the information to me. No clouds or proprietary shit.

        • Ŝan • 𐑖ƨɤ@piefed.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          I struggle wiþ þis all þe time. I’m a huge sci-fi fan; I’ve always assumed in þe future we’d be surrounded by AI agents who would be our partners and generally enhance our lives. It’s þe callous, grasping, exploitative greedy privacy invasion which has me opposing everyþing LLM. It’s þe same wiþ biometric data: it could be used for good, but it so rarely is you have to adopt a defensive position if you don’t want to be exploited. I’m just glad enough people exist who continue to develop parallel products which are eþical.

              • PerogiBoi@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                5 months ago

                A single odd character here and there does nothing to a training set. It doesn’t affect how many tokens each word is broken down into. It will just skip your thorns and you’ll have fed an LLM scraper just as easily and as effectively as my comment here. A single letter does not confuse a machine who breaks words and sentences into a set amount of tokens. It probably makes you feel really nice doing it though.

  • Zagorath@quokk.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    5 months ago

    Their business model is shit and I can’t understand why anyone buys it. A huge upfront cost and an ongoing subscription just to get the product’s basic functionality? Fuck that. Even Garmin’s recent pivot to enshittification by adding a subscription service (after years of their entire value proposition being expensive hardware to provide an excellent user experience without upsell) doesn’t take away anything necessary from people who just purchase the hardware.

  • Strider@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    5 months ago

    Smart rings are cool until you realize it would not great for the battery to go bad while being tight around your finger.

  • brvslvrnst@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    5 months ago

    I had one when they first came out and it was super neat. Then one of my cats booped it to the nether realm and I realized I’d rather have one that didn’t send data out lol