A new report by Human Rights Watch argues that the compulsory use of Chinese as the primary language in schools in Tibet raises “serious concerns under international human rights law”.

  • GirthBrooksPLO@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    1 day ago

    What I don’t get about the CCP shills is why they think I would trust the Chinese government when I don’t even trust my own government.

      • AlJones@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Something to consider is that most of the propaganda that makes it past the Great Firewall is likely to attempt to paint a positive view of China given that the CCP has so much control over it.

  • j_overgrens@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 day ago

    The amount of people here using EXACTLY the same disgusting reasoning that 19th century Europeans used for genocide is… well disgusting.

  • Tonava@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    It’s always the same with the propagandists:

    • Tibet does not exist and there’s nothing going on there, it’s western propaganda (Tibet has existed for a long time, China invaded Tibet, there’s information from reliable sources genocide is happening)
    • if there’s something going on it’s good for the tibetans and they want it (tibetans themselves have right to decide what they want, and they don’t seem to want to be genocided)
    • their savage culture needs to be civilized anyway (this is just racism and imperialism to justify genocide and erasure of people)
    • the leadership of Tibet is corrupt and Dalai Lama is on the epstein list so they need to be liberated (you can’t just invade your neighbors even if they have problems)
    • big list of how “the west” has done bad things (others doing bad things too doesn’t justify doing them yourself)
    • random reasons why it’s not genocide (erasure of culture is genocide by the definitions of genocide)

    edit// oh, and next is personal attacks towards people going against their propaganda lmao. Here’s some facts to save some time if anyone wants to look for some faults to discredit me: I’m not american but finnish and I do not support their fascist idiots in power, my country did not colonize anyone (we were the poor losers), we allied with the nazis in ww2 because everyone was allied with soviets and left us at their mercy as a collateral (and we backstabbed the nazis the moment it was a better course of action), I do not support Israel and the genocide of palestinians needs to stop, Russia invaded Ukraine and is genociding there

    Oh, and I do not hate chinese people or culture in any capacity, it’s their leadership that’s responsible. I am just very much against genocide, no matter who is doing it

  • merdaverse@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    16 hours ago

    A new report by Human Rights Watch argues that the compulsory use of the Tuscan dialect as the primary language in schools in Italy raises “serious concerns under international human rights law”. At the time of adoption, only 2.5% of the population spoke Italian. This ongoing cultural genocide of 2 centuries has led to some not knowing their own regional dialect, and in some extreme cases, to people from different Italian regions understanding each other!!1

    Yes, this news is so silly, that applying the same logic in Europe makes it read like an Onion article.

  • lechekaflan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Am I in r/sino?

    Eradicating one culture deemed medieval and feudalistic and replacing it with a ethnosupremacist form of feudalist capitalism disguised in a pseudo-Maoist wrapper… Standard fare in the Pooh World where what the Hans are doing is “liberation”. Not only that, the Tibetan plateau is like a smorgasbord for Mainlander corporations looking for rare-earth resources, so there comes the program of forced assimilation which is no more different from banishing all Palestinians from their lands.

    (BTW, Israel sold to China some several key technologies, including early-warning radar.)

    • dubyakay@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 days ago

      Except the only culture being killed off is a feudal theocracy.

      Tibetan is still taught in their schools, along with Chinese. HRW is a Zionist organization. OP is a serial Zionist-apologia poster from Isn’treal (just click through their post history). Their agenda is to post US/Zionazi propaganda only.

  • bouh@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    Honestly, France has been doing this for 2 centuries now. Is it bad because China is doing it?

      • bouh@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I’ve never seen an article about France on this matter. Is it more important if it’s in China ? That is the link you refuse to see I guess.

    • TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 day ago

      Tibet was it’s own country until China communists conquered it in 1951.

      Weird how nobody ever talks about that…

      in the 50s France was dumping it’s colonies.

    • GirthBrooksPLO@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      So its OK then that France did that? You can’t excuse one instance of imperialism and complain about another. All Imperialism is bad, regardless of who is doing it to whom.

      • bouh@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I’m not excusing anything. I’m just looking at targeted blame. China is the most terrible country for everything it does. Just don’t look anywhere else, especially not the allies of the west.

  • Riverside@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    2 days ago

    Literally US Zionist propaganda

    From Wikipedia

    Human Rights Watch (HRW) is a nonprofit watchdog group headquartered in New York City

    In 2026, HRW’s Israel and Palestine director resigned after HRW blocked a report that argued that Israel’s denial of the Palestinian right of return is a “crime against humanity”.

    In 2014, two Nobel Peace Laureates, Adolfo Pérez Esquivel and Mairead Maguire, wrote a letter signed by 100 other human rights activists and scholars criticizing HRW for its revolving-door hiring practices with the U.S. government, its failure to denounce the U.S. practice of extrajudicial rendition, its endorsement of the U.S. 2011 military intervention in Libya, and its silence during the 2004 Haitian coup d’état.

    Why are you posting Zionist propaganda "NGO"s?

    • rwrwefwef@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      14 hours ago

      In 2026, HRW’s Israel and Palestine director resigned after HRW blocked a report that argued that Israel’s denial of the Palestinian right of return is a “crime against humanity”.

      Hmm. The more you know.

      • Riverside@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        These are the people who pretend to be super concerned about the Tibetan language while ignoring that Tibet enjoys being an Autonomous Republic within China (with all the added political power), that Tibetan is the official language in the Tibetan Autonomous Republic, and that the number of Tibetan speakers has skyrocketed from about 1mn in the 1950s to about 6mn nowadays. For comparison, in 1920 there were about 1mn speakers of Occitan in southern France and now there are about 100k and Occitan still doesn’t enjoy any official character

    • Lucius_Sweet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      ·
      2 days ago

      I’m no fan of Zionists but what you are doing is attacking and attempting to discredit the source to distract from the message that they are trying to push.

      The story here is the attempted cultural genocide of the Tibetan people by the Chinese government. I come from a nation that has almost lost its language as a result of similar colonial cultural genocide. This issue may not be real or important to you but it is an attempt to destroy a nation’s cohesion and identity.

      The real question for me is why are you trying to discredit an article on this, what is your agenda here Riverside?

      • rwrwefwef@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        13 hours ago

        I’m no fan of Zionists but what you are doing is attacking and attempting to discredit the source to distract from the message that they are trying to push.

        It cuts both ways. The source here is probably pushing this news to align with a certain (pro-American) narrative, likely with some amplifications along the way.

      • vagrancyand@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        2 days ago

        It isn’t cultural genocide to teach the only useful language in the region, while requiring the cultural language also be taught.

        • phutatorius@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 day ago

          Cultural erasure is a form of genocide by most definitions.

          China is not just requiring the teaching of Mandarin, it is taking steps to eradicate the use of Tibetan and other non-Han languages.

          And yes, Western countries have done it too, and it’s just as much a crime when they do it. For example, in Britain, children used to be punished for speaking Welsh or Gaelic in schools. The same happened with Catalan and Basque in Spain. Those are just two of many examples.

        • Lucius_Sweet@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          21 hours ago

          Who are you to decide which languages are useful and which ones are not? Chinese is a very basic picture based language, barely a step above cave paintings. The people of Tibet will never progress if they are forced to use such a basic, primitive language. Relative to their population China has produced a pathetic quantity of great literature, maybe if China was to adopt the Tibetan language the quality of their literature would improve.

      • Riverside@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        2 days ago

        attempting to discredit the source to distract from the message that they are trying to push

        Yes, because the message they’re trying to push is “China bad” as a US-gvt and Zionist controlled “NGO”, in the current cold war that the US is instigating against China as the former loses worldwide economic dominance.

        The story here is the attempted cultural genocide of the Tibetan people by the Chinese government

        Yes, and I’d take it seriously if it was real and not fabricated propaganda designed to target the most progressive among us.

        I come from a nation that has almost lost its language as a result of similar colonial cultural genocide

        I’m very sorry about that. Is China the aggressor in your instance, or are you projecting Western colonialist history onto China because the US propaganda outlets are telling us to do so?

        This issue may not be real or important to you

        It’s extremely important to me. And if it were important to you, you’d be doing activism not for the fabricated false news about Tibetan language, but actual cultural genocides ongoing right now in the west that I haven’t seen you do activism about, such as Breton or Occitan in France, the latter of which has gone from 1Mn speakers to 100k over the past century and, to this day, enjoys no official recognition or status. Lhasa Tibetan is, TODAY, the official language of the Tibet Autonomous Region of China. In the 1950s, there were about a million speakers of Tibetan in China, today there are about 6 million. From Wikipedia:

        "In the Texas Journal of International Law, Barry Sautman stated that “none of the many recent studies of endangered languages deems Tibetan to be imperiled, and language maintenance among Tibetans contrasts with language loss even in the remote areas of Western states renowned for liberal policies”

        I understand your concern with the preservation of languages and cultures, I completely share that mindset. However, I urge you to look at the material facts beyond US/Zionist-fabricated fearmongering: Chinese currency portrays the currency values written in Tibetan among other languages of China, Tibetan speakers only grow over time according to modern evidence, and the countries warning against such acts are literally carrying out unspoken acts of linguistic genocide.

        • Lucius_Sweet@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          21 hours ago

          Yes, because the message they’re trying to push is “China bad” as a US-gvt and Zionist controlled “NGO”

          Yes but are they lying? Is it not true that China is unilaterally changing the primary language to Chinese for schools in Tibet?

          Yes, and I’d take it seriously if it was real and not fabricated propaganda

          Why do you say it is not real, human rights watch is just one source, a quick search leads to several sources you can find yourself. This is also not a new issue, there is information on the promotion of Mandarin over Chinese in Tibetan schools going back years. Just because you do not accept what is happening does not make it propagand

          Is China the aggressor in your instance, or are you projecting Western colonialist history onto China

          Colonialism is still colonialism, doesn’t matter if it’s Chinese or western it’s all the same. Erasure of cultural identity and especially language is always a big part.

          And if it were important to you, you’d be doing activism

          I don’t need you to tell me what I should be doing buddy.

          I haven’t seen you do activism about, such as Breton or Occitan in France,

          To be fair you haven’t seen me do anything, I am an anonymous internet stranger. For all you know I was marching the streets of Rennes in support of my brothers there.

          This is also “whataboutism” on your part, one of the lowest forms of rhetoric. Up your game and stick to the point at hand please.

          is, TODAY, the official language of the Tibet Autonomous Region of China. In the 1950s, there were about a million speakers of Tibetan in China, today there are about 6 million.

          I see that you capitalised the word today, either you understand the concept of time or are, like Donald Trump, a fool who capitalises words for no reason. You should also then be able to understand that this measure is meant to reduce the amount of native Tibetan speakers going forwards in time. You seem to be trying to use the fact that there are more Tibetan speakers today than in 1950 as proof that China is not trying to reduce native Tibetan speakers in the future? How does this make sense in your thick head buddy? Does this type of argument ever work on people?

          Have you ever considered that maybe the Zionists, the USA AND China are all bad? All are shitty imperial colonists.

          • Riverside@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            20 hours ago

            Cool, keep believing your western made-up anti-China propaganda about Tibet erasure while all scholars on the topic agree that the language is healthy, preserved, and the number of speakers keeps growing…

  • baizi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    2 days ago

    I wouldn’t believe shit coming from human rights watch, people are being made stateless where I’m from and I haven’t heard a peep out of them. Current estimates look around 300k or so.

    • Eldritch@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      2 days ago

      Why wouldn’t you believe it? That only proves they have bias, not that they’re lying. At worst it’s no better than US, Russian, or Chinese state media. Which many happily accept. If there’s a problem with the message counter the message, not the messenger.

      • baizi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        Im saying they are driven by western interest and not actual human rights watch issues.

        Human rights apply to white people only and political issues that the west doesn’t agree on, this is what they have turned the UN to. Their credibility isn’t there.

        • Eldritch@piefed.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 day ago

          I don’t disagree that they are pointing out things for their own agenda. But just because someone has an agenda and points something out doesn’t make it false. The fact that they haven’t pointed out nor ever made claims about groups XY and z. Doesn’t mean they lack credibility. They generally been correct when pointing out abuses of the groups they have pointed out. You’re still attacking the messenger and cannot disprove the message.

  • Urist@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    2 days ago

    Resistance since the uprising of 1959 has persisted under the current Dalai Lama, a “potent force despite decades of propaganda, political crackdowns and education drives aimed at undermining his authority”, living in exile in India.

    What authority are they talking about? Are they arguing that education should not be offered and that instead theocratic leadership is what is most important when considering human rights? I think rather the real propaganda comes from the west in favour of a feudal theocracy.

    • trxxruraxvr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      ·
      2 days ago

      Tibet is being oppressed. The Dalai Lama was in the Epstein files.

      Those thing are not mutually exclusive

      • EvergreenGuru@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        2 days ago

        He’s the official leader of Tibet in the west. He represents the Tibetan political movement. If you understood Tibet as the Lama sees it, you’d understand what’s being advocated for is a theocracy that practiced slavery. “Free Tibet” is Lost Cause revisionism.

        Before modern Chinese administration, monasteries and the DL held great power, owned vast swaths of land and held legal authority, similar to the Catholic Church in the Middle Ages. Since China incorporated Tibet there’s been secular law and modern infrastructure built in Tibet.

        The Chinese government wants all areas it governs to have industries which give people work to build a better quality of life. Part of that is having the communication skills to interact with the job market in China. Mandarin in schools is basic education for future citizens to find work. And outside of anti-government, pro-monastery propaganda, Tibetans are allowed to say, write, and read anything they want in their native language.

          • EvergreenGuru@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 days ago

            Very funny. But for the US to be strong enough to save the Tibetans, first you would have to free all the poor US students who are being genocided into learning Spanish.

        • trxxruraxvr@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          22
          ·
          2 days ago

          There is a difference between government and culture. The Chinese are also trying to terminate the Tibetan language and the cultural customs of common people.

          • Tolc@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            2 days ago

            The Chinese are also trying to terminate the Tibetan language and the cultural customs of common people.

            no they arent

        • deft@lemmy.wtfBanned from community
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          2 days ago

          Ah but the big thing you’re missing. Is Tibet doesn’t want this.

          China has done everything it can to destroy the culture and make them culturally Chinese.

          • Riverside@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            2 days ago

            but the big thing you’re missing. Is Tibet doesn’t want this

            Really? Could you show us the polls proving discontent in Tibet? Or is it just an unfalsifiable claim made by the so-called "Tibet Government in Exile, itself funded by the US?

            You’re falling for US propaganda, you have literally no evidence that Tibetans living in Tibet have serious concerns with their government.

          • EvergreenGuru@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            2 days ago

            Tibet doesn’t want modern infrastructure like the Chinese have built? They don’t want a modern education or modern jobs? They want to be ruled by monasteries headed by the Dalai Lama, a theocracy led by a man in the Epstein files? You must be pretty racist against Tibetans to believe that.

            • deft@lemmy.wtfBanned from community
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              26
              ·
              2 days ago

              They don’t want to be Chinese or China. The rest is irrelevant and quiet frankly insulting.

              Europeans said the same about indigenous Americans. I guess you support that too?

              It’s the same thing China is doing to Uyghur Muslims.

              It’s called genocide

              • EvergreenGuru@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                2 days ago

                Even more insulting is comparing real genocide with having children take Mandarin classes.

                Show me videos of the Chinese treating the Tibetans the way Israelis treat Palestinians. Show me Chinese soldiers shooting missiles at Tibetan schools, hospitals, and places of worship. Show me the Chinese military killing Tibetans by the thousands and bragging about it.

                Why hasn’t the international criminal court put out an arrest warrant if an actual genocide is taking place? Cry me a river, you propagandistic liar!

                • deft@lemmy.wtfBanned from community
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  20
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  Suck my nut it’s genocide and I don’t care how much you say it isn’t.

                  We aren’t arguing an opinion. It’s a fact.

                  “Generally speaking, genocide does not necessarily mean the immediate destruction of a nation, except when accomplished by mass killings of all members of a nation. It is intended rather to signify a coordinated plan of different actions aiming at the destruction of essential foundations of the life of national groups, with the aim of annihilating the groups themselves. Genocide is directed against the national group as an entity, and the actions involved are directed against individuals, not in their individual capacity, but as members of the national group”

              • Tolc@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 days ago

                there is no genocide there, unjust prosecution of certain ethnicities? on smaller level yes. Genocide? not even close.

                • deft@lemmy.wtfBanned from community
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  Genocide is the death of a culture. If China has it their way there would be no Tibet.

        • HM King Charles III DG FD@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          2 days ago

          They even have tibetan on their banknotes iirc as well. I’ve never seen minority languages on the British bank notes. The best thing that I have seen is a Ceilidh on the £20 Ulster Bank note.

        • Fizz@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          2 days ago

          This investment is only to extract resources to support central china and suppress the Tibetans by increasing surveillance.