• mrdown@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    15 days ago

    Your source did not say iran was seeking a nuke. American inteligence and the fatwa by the sepreame leader himself shows that your claim is a dirty lie repeated by Netenyahu for decades.

    What I said was it’s reasonable for Israelis to support a war with Iran without being war junkies

    No it is not reasonable. It the same goddamn thing with different wording. Every single goddamn government of israel voted by Israelis supported colonization. Israelis knows really well that they want to destroy Iran as a state so it can start the greater israel project with zero resistance

    • CerealKiller01@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      15 days ago

      Your source did not say iran was seeking a nuke.

      You’re right, it said “Iran’s advances included enriching uranium to 60 percent, a level close to weapons-grade that has no practical civilian application, and deploying advanced centrifuges that enrich uranium more efficiently.” They’re probably just doing it as a prank. Maybe they’ll open the centrifuges and fake snakes will pop out of them.

      American inteligence

      Look, I gave several links to my claims. At the very least try and provide a source instead of repeating the same things.

      fatwa by the sepreame leader himself

      Oh, awesome, the supreme leader of Iran pinky swore Iran isn’t building a bomb.

        • CerealKiller01@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          15 days ago

          They was at 60% for years

          The Arms control association seems at the very least as a good starting off source. If you disagree with their assessment, feel free to link to other sources. I’m sure you’ll get on it right after the citation about the American intelligence.

          You just a zionazi who repeat Netenyahu lies

          Right, I’m the one just repeating things mindlessly. On an unrelated note, calling me Nazi Zionist colonialist liar for 10 times didn’t really get you anywhere, but I have a good feeling about the 11th time.

          • mrdown@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            15 days ago

            Since 2021 they have 60% enrichment . Trump teared the deal in 2018. And again it do not prove Iran was seeking a nuke. It would have taken only three weeks to go from 60% to 90%. You just a zionazi repeating Israel lies and manufacturing consent for this war of aggression

            Only a zionazi still claim iran was seeking a nuke when no evidence that shows it

            • CerealKiller01@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              15 days ago

              Dude, that’s hilarious, your own source disagrees with your conclusion:

              “Iran has no civilian use or justification for its production of 60 percent enriched uranium, particularly at the level of hundreds of kilograms. Its rush to make much more, quickly depleting its stock of near 20 percent enriched uranium, which has a civilian use in research reactors, raises more questions. Even if one believed the production of 60 percent is to create bargaining leverage in a nuclear negotiation, Iran has gone way beyond what would be needed. One has to conclude that Iran’s real intent is to be prepared to produce large quantities of WGU as quickly as possible, in as few centrifuges as possible.”

              Not surprisingly, and in its understated style, the IAEA reiterated in this most recent report: “The significantly increased production and accumulation of highly enriched uranium by Iran, the only non-nuclear-weapon State to produce such nuclear material, is of serious concern.”"

              Yes, yes, I know - zionazi, lies, Netanyahu etc.

              • mrdown@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                15 days ago

                It would have taken 3 weeks to build a nuke. They did not. That’s the only fact , the rest is speculation. Zionazi. Why do you still can’t admit israel is a settter colonial power attacking iran to start the greater israel project

                • CerealKiller01@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  13 days ago

                  It would have taken 3 weeks to build a nuke. They did not. That’s the only fact

                  OK, and your own source state that “fact” where…?

                  And why are you disregarding things that have been clearly stated in your source that disagree with you?

                  Also, by that logic, since it would have taken Israel a few weeks to murder the entire Palestinian population in Gaza and they did not, any claim that there’s a genocide in Gaza is wrong.

                  • mrdown@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    13 days ago

                    And expert in the field can know how long it would take for a technical task to be done so when it says 3 weeks i believe it. Saying 60% of enriched uranium can’t be used as a negociation tool is just speculation . If iran plan was to build a nuke and enrich to 90% american and israeli inteligence would have known about it. If iran wanted a nuke it would have done it , it is very logical since they was at 60% for years before the 12 days war