Seems evil enough to me, if they’re doing it purpoesly why hasn’t a mod or someone told em to knock it off and to start their own instance with their bs?
The difference being that an ad is trying to sway you to buy a product, but a credit or signature on art is “here’s who created this thing THAT YOU ARE ALREADY EXPERIENCING”.
I don’t know why they can’t distinguish between those.
That’s the most deranged take on ads I’ve ever heard. Sure, fuck the billion dollar companies and their ads. Artists? Dude what the fuck, you’re stealing they’re work and taking active steps to remove the artist’s name. Nobody is gaining anything on this, the artist looses, and OP looses both time and fucking respect. What the hell is wrong with that person.
Well that explains the recent push to not remove attributions instead of just requiring them. Must have missed that post because of the down vote threshold.
Thanks. That’s quite the extreme take, I get not wanting a crappy watermark across the whole comic. But a subtle signature, or small panel with their name should be fine.
If they erase social links, that’s still crappy but more understandable.
If they really believe the image it self shouldn’t have a credit, then they should put the credit in the post description. They could use a spoiler, so it’s up the individual if they want to be “advertised” to.
The OP has stated that they won’t consistently attribute sources, even in the way you suggest, until the community implements the rule they want enforcing that users strip attribution out: https://lemmus.org/comment/17161116
They don’t deserve your benefit of the doubt, unfortunately.
This is a comic by beetlemoses.
OP believes that leaving in the comic name or artist’s signature is “advertising”.
https://lemmus.org/post/21226925
They have been caught repeatedly removing them through cropping and other means.
Seems evil enough to me, if they’re doing it purpoesly why hasn’t a mod or someone told em to knock it off and to start their own instance with their bs?
I think the mod in this sun hasn’t been active for about a month
The difference being that an ad is trying to sway you to buy a product, but a credit or signature on art is “here’s who created this thing THAT YOU ARE ALREADY EXPERIENCING”.
I don’t know why they can’t distinguish between those.
That’s the most deranged take on ads I’ve ever heard. Sure, fuck the billion dollar companies and their ads. Artists? Dude what the fuck, you’re stealing they’re work and taking active steps to remove the artist’s name. Nobody is gaining anything on this, the artist looses, and OP looses both time and fucking respect. What the hell is wrong with that person.
Well that explains the recent push to not remove attributions instead of just requiring them. Must have missed that post because of the down vote threshold.
What a tool.
Thanks. That’s quite the extreme take, I get not wanting a crappy watermark across the whole comic. But a subtle signature, or small panel with their name should be fine.
If they erase social links, that’s still crappy but more understandable.
If they really believe the image it self shouldn’t have a credit, then they should put the credit in the post description. They could use a spoiler, so it’s up the individual if they want to be “advertised” to.
Artist Credit
beetlemoses
The OP has stated that they won’t consistently attribute sources, even in the way you suggest, until the community implements the rule they want enforcing that users strip attribution out: https://lemmus.org/comment/17161116
They don’t deserve your benefit of the doubt, unfortunately.
Wow, what a loony. Must have gotten on the wrong end of his high horse.
Damn I didn’t know about that post of theirs.