I would bet my life savings they already trained on your data
Right. My theory is that for all of the AI companies that have that don’t use my data option, it’s just an option on the screen. It doesn’t actually do anything. They still use your data.
It’s not GitHub. It’s Microsoft. Never forget that.
- MicrosoftHub?
- GitSoft?
- MicroHub?
🤔
SlopHub
That is the winner right there.
Compuglobalhypermeganet.
Nothing intelligent will come of assimilating my code.
I think the only thing I have on my github account is an arduino light blinky thing I wrote at 4 AM while crossfaded because a friend needed a glowy wizard staff for a party. It can only make the model worse.
Stupid, even naive question. What about AGPL code used in this training?
Would that means that the output is also AGPL?They already trained their AIs on basically all the GPL code. They don’t care.
Should “we” care?
And if so, what we can do about it?
That legal question is not yet clearly answered. I think absolutely yes, but the Megacorps and pro-ai people don’t seem to care.
lol, enjoy my bugs Octocat
Octocat tentacle winks you “bye!”.
Oh no, they will improve the service with public data, how horrible
No, they will be using user’s copyrighted work, including that which is in a “private” repository, to extract value for themselves.
Also the AI is trained on FOSS code but then used to make closed code that ignores the open licenses of the FOSS code that it copied.
If you use a public ai agent on it your repo isn’t really ‘private’
> Microslop
> improve
The amout and quality of training data correlates with quality of AI models.
They can pay me for consent to use my data, then.
They pay you 100 times over with the service
