SSTF@lemmy.world to NonCredibleDefense@piefed.socialEnglish · 28 days agoYou think you can defeat me?lemmy.worldimagemessage-square22linkfedilinkarrow-up1154
arrow-up1154imageYou think you can defeat me?lemmy.worldSSTF@lemmy.world to NonCredibleDefense@piefed.socialEnglish · 28 days agomessage-square22linkfedilink
minus-squareSchool_Lunch@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·28 days agoOk so my impression from these posts is that its hard to hit a helicopter, but I was thinking if helicopters fly by pushing air downward, would simply getting a drone above a helicopter suck it down into the blades?
minus-squaremarcos@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·28 days ago would simply getting a drone above a helicopter suck it down into the blades? Slightly. But I don’t know why you are trying to solve the problem of making things in air move downward.
minus-squareAtelopus-zeteki@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up3·28 days agoThe drone solved that problem. The russian heli went down. Hence the noncredibility of the cope cage defense.
Ok so my impression from these posts is that its hard to hit a helicopter, but I was thinking if helicopters fly by pushing air downward, would simply getting a drone above a helicopter suck it down into the blades?
Slightly. But I don’t know why you are trying to solve the problem of making things in air move downward.
The drone solved that problem. The russian heli went down. Hence the noncredibility of the cope cage defense.