• harc@szmer.info
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    25 days ago

    He’s a боль in the ass.

    From a stateist perspective with the broadly know state of the Polish army rejecting any source of finance for it is borderline treason. And his sode basically claims the problem is that we have to necesarly buy american equipment. Which they did when in goverment underminding long term programs and getting less for more, so now we have unarmed helicopters and tanks we cant roll through half of the local land features.

    • plyth@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      24 days ago

      and tanks we cant roll through half of the local land features.

      The German and American tanks? Wasn’t it a conscious decision to have stronger tanks where possible?

      • harc@szmer.info
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        24 days ago

        This is about Abrams spefically. A lot of oir infrastructure is not adjusted to their size and weight, and they might not be the best option for the local marches, swamps and thick forrests which is all of Polands east (plus some mountines to the south). Its a tank for open plains.

        • plyth@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          24 days ago

          My interpretation was that they are an insurance against another German attack. It sounds a bit unreasonable but I think it allows them to focus on the east.