• XLE@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    203
    ·
    1 month ago

    Mozilla has released so many self-described AI features in the past few years, but this is the only one that has:

    • been requested by the community
    • received broad critical acclaim

    I hope Mozilla learns their lesson. I doubt they will, but I hope.

    • doug@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      sadly I’ll likely support them through any shitty decisions they make as they are the only viable non-chromium alternative these days.

      I get they’re chasing the buck and trying to stay relevant, but uhhhh… if they could be less Steve Buscemi-teen about it, that’d be great.

      • stoy@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        I strongly believe that the EU should fund Mozilla, or a fork of Firefox.

        Gecko is the only viable competitor to Blink/WebKit, and it is needed

            • hraegsvelmir@ani.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              Firefox is just the browser, Mozilla is the organization constantly wasting money on features Firefox’s users are actively hostile to in a bid to tempt away people already using Chrome. Not the OP, but I’d be down to donate to Firefox’s development directly, but I wouldn’t want to make a donation to Mozilla hoping it would go toward Firefox, only to find out they took my money to build some new LLM integration that nobody asked for, only to sit unused for years before being quietly shuttered in favor of the new tech buzzword of the day.

        • halcyoncmdr@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Last time I tried Waterfox some sites like Twitch that actively block usage on old browsers, refused to work because the latest Waterfox release was based on a Firefox like 20+ builds behind.

          Firefox was on like version 142 and the latest Waterfox download was based on build 128.

          • XLE@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            Waterfox right now is built on ESR 148, which is on par with the latest Firefox release! ESR releases will lag several versions behind, but that’s normal (even on Mozilla’s side), and I’d be kind of shocked if it was such a big gap

            Edit: there was a big gap. 128 to 140 was the right jump, but Waterfox non-betas took a little less than two months to implement the change after Mozilla released it.