• zxqwas@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    How do you persuade them that you’re right or how do you come up with an argument that makes you feel like your chosen ideology does not have any flaws?

    The first: you probably can’t. They are just as set in their world view like anyone else arguing on the Internet, including you and me.

    Second: accept that all ideologies have flaws. Policies however well meaning have to survive contact with reality first and foremost. Or in this case reality has to survive contact with the policy.

  • HamFistedVegan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    6 days ago

    I suppose I would start by saying “Communism lead to famine in the USSR and China” is like saying “Capitalism lead to Nazi Germany and Fascist Italy”.

    It’s down to the application of the system. True Communism gives power to the ordinary workers. It is not meant to be concentrated in the hands of an autocrat or an elite. That is precisely what it aims to prevent.

    The last two points are just not true. The incentives are, in theory, workers having better standards due to better wealth distribution (if it is managed properly) and they don’t use capitalist products because the products were made under a Communist system, so that’s just ridiculous.

    Communism has many flaws. Personally I think it’s more of a pipe dream myself, but the arguments you have stated against it are not good ones.

  • macniel@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    6 days ago

    I don’t understand “who supports it use products of capitalism”; does the someone want to imply that every product is made with capitalism? What is opensource then, when money isn’t the driving force of open source development?

    • frankPodmore@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 days ago

      Even if you use open source software exclusively, the hardware you run it on was still manufactured under capitalism, the hardware it was built on was manufactured under capitalism, the electricity you’re powering your hardware with was provided by capitalism, and the very economic system that allowed the devs to build and maintain the software… was capitalism.

      None of this is in capitalism’s favour. That there’s no getting away from it is, for Marxists, a key argument against it.

  • frankPodmore@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    6 days ago

    I’m not a communist myself, but the last point is so fatuous that I think it’s fair to conclude that anyone actually making it is not arguing in good faith.

    The first two, though, are completely valid arguments and you should respond to them by ceasing to describe yourself as a communist!

    • db2@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      If you mean the anarchism one then you’re right. Usually when someone starts talking about that I assume they’re literally 13 years old and being edgy like they tend to do.

  • RobotToaster@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 days ago

    There was only ever one famine in the USSR, partly caused by kulaks burning grain. There were dozens of famines under the Tsars.

    The same goes for China, there were dozens of famines under the emperors.

    Communism ended famine.

    Were those famines caused by poor political decisions? Possibly, but both countries were emerging from feudal subsistence farming, and had been ravaged by bitter civil wars. The position they were in meant even a single poor political decision could have caused a famine, if we were in that position today, with the leaders we have, we would all be dead.

  • theywilleatthestars@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    Do you think people aren’t intrinsically motivated to feed themselves? Also, those famines happened because of a guy named Trofim Lysenko got into Stalin’s good graces while having some batshit unscientific ideas about botany. You don’t need communism for that, see RFK Jr, or the cigarette industry, or everyone who denies or downplays climate change because they don’t want to have the deal with it.

  • Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    A political idea should fill people’s bellies? Are you saying that?

    Does the love of chocolate make you a sweet person?