• Flamekebab@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    6 days ago

    Does this mean we can see the end of the overly long film trend?

    I miss films being ~80 - 90 minutes. I’ve had a long day, I don’t want to commit to three hours unless it’s something really special.

      • Flamekebab@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        A well constructed film does not feel rushed in a shorter run time.

        I like long films, like really long ones. Ones where the length is part of the experience. For example, I loved Apocalypse Now Redux.

        What I don’t like is films that are substantially longer than they need to be. I don’t want them pared down, I want them built around the format their story suits rather than padded out. I like breathing room (mostly!) but it’s a fine line to walk.

        A good film opening gets on with things quickly, getting the viewer up to speed, but too often I find myself quoting Springfieldians from Marge vs. The Monorail - “GET TO THE MONEY!”

    • Beacon@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      6 days ago

      Yesssssss, thank you. 1:30 is the sweet spot. It can go up to like 1:50 and i still totally dig it. Once it goes above 2 hours it starts to detract from my enjoyment of the experience instead of adding to it

      • nogooduser@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        6 days ago

        My sweet spot is the 2:00 to 2:15 mark. Any less than that feels like an extended TV episode to me.

        For some reason, horror movies are good at 1:30 to 1:45.

    • TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      most comedy and horror films are that short.

      the long films are action movies. and you’r emostly talking about comic book movies.