• StonerCowboy@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    3 days ago

    They just lowering the prices cause of his backlash for supporting Trump.

    Fuck Proton. Snitching ass bitches.

      • StonerCowboy@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 days ago

        “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.”

        That’s you and all the trumpets.

  • commander@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Damn. People here sure love purity testing. The guy could pay for their cancer treatment and still slap him every chance because they got it wrong publicly in the past but once you get it wrong publicly once, you’re out of the club. Go be a conservative we don’t want you. When someone at Tuta has a bad year and ends up in the wrong publicly, find another email service to try and convince people to go too. Probably worse in functionality than Tuta as you go down to smaller and worse funded efforts in this niche field of Internet activism

    But people here do it here too to Mozilla because they don’t like their social outreach programs and their attempts to get advertising revenue so screw Mozilla too. So because nothing but perfection is acceptable, push away people that may be adjacent/left leaning right and switch to less developed products. Switch from Firefox and attack Mozilla who do the bulk of Firefox development and use Waterfox who do a custom deployment/build. Pure display of perfection being the enemy of good here.

    You want people to embrace privacy but keep whiplashing people around when the org/anyone in leadership says something wrong. Screw Signal, they’re not perfect. Screw Matrix/Element, some developer said something one day so it’s all bad. I’m surprised anyone here uses any privacy software or a major open source software like Linux or Krita or Blender at the risk that someone in the background may be wrong in someway which I am 100% certain they exist in important positions. Same with Lemmy

    Go back to the 60s and you all would be shitting on Fred Hampton for accepting the impure and the color coalition for everyone that had ever said something wrong. Al Franken definitely would not make it with y’all. Y’all can’t build up leftist communities because y’all are bitter assholes that can’t move on and spend so much time purity testing. Y’all are probably mediocre too so can’t make a difference in privacy and data ownership activism anyways so should be lining up to support not just Tuta, someone hasn’t screwed up publicly yet, and Proton

    Reminds me of Aung San Suu Kyi. She was under the gun of the military ruling class that permitted limited democratic government and because she didn’t make speech as if she lived in the US, a bunch of Americans turned on her and celebrated when the military dictatorship came back to rule and put her in prison the moment it seemed like the civilian government would actually assert more power

    • anachrohack@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      3 days ago

      It’s not a purity test so much as a fear that publicly signaling loyalty to trump devalued their trustworthiness as private and secure. If their CEO legitimately believes that Republicans are better on tech policy than democrats because conservatives want to weaponize the federal government to control speech online, then I don’t really trust him not to cooperate with federal authorities when they want to access someone’s emails or vpn traffic. Conservatives are simply not trustworthy to me

  • nous@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    194
    ·
    5 days ago

    Yen also pointed out how such a court decision could help cut inflation in the US, too, “by dropping the price of a significant chunk of digital purchases by 30% overnight”.

    I bet most companies will just take that extra 30% as profit rather than giving it back to their users like proton has.

    • athairmor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      48
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      Yeah, even of the companies don’t pocket the difference, he’s an idiot to suggest that this will cut inflation.

      This guy is just not very smart, I think.

      • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        61
        ·
        5 days ago

        I think he’s a salesperson trying to sell the idea that getting rid of the apple tax is good for consumers.

      • glimse@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        5 days ago

        Or he’s just shitting on other companies who he knows are too greedy to do the same. Proton is getting positive press for this and he’s leaning into it with a bit of hyperbole

        Not saying he’s a genius or anything, he’s just a spokesperson doing spokesperson things

        • paraphrand@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          How many years until prices go up? I bet they marked down 1-2 years where they realize they can’t up the prices. But after, it will creep up.

    • plz1@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      5 days ago

      Yeah, Proton is bucking the obvious trend, with this one. Most companies will totally take the profits rather than lowering prices.

    • Zak@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      5 days ago

      Companies that were app-first like mobile games probably won’t cut prices much if any. Companies that were web-first like Proton and Patreon probably will.

    • ugjka@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      You mean tariffs on services and the EU been floating the idea of putting tariff on US big tech

  • suicidaleggroll@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    If they can charge 30% less without Apple’s fees, then why are their prices the same whether you buy on their iOS app or direct on their website? Why have they been overcharging users who don’t buy through the iOS app by 30% all this time?

  • AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    No doubt Proton’s CEO will use this to justify his “Trump is better for regulating big tech” claim, while ignoring that the judge is an Obama appointee.

  • fubarx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    5 days ago

    It’s not exactly 30%. For sales below $1M, it’s 15%: https://developer.apple.com/app-store/small-business-program/

    In Europe, where this was established last year, they started charging a Core Technology Fee to cover the cost of hosting and data transfer: https://developer.apple.com/support/core-technology-fee/

    And if you switch payment providers, you have to pay at least 2.5% plus transaction and any intermediary fees.

    It’s nice that Proton is offering a discount, but for everyone else there may be additional ongoing costs.

  • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    5 days ago

    I got a Proton two-year subscription that averages out to two dollars and change per month.

    I already feel like I got an incredible deal.