I find this shit funny as hell in the short term, but
It does make our work harder.
If you really need to take a screenshot for the meme, please at least just use the VisualEditor, which is a what-you-see-is-what-you-get (WYSIWYG) editor that will allow for a near-identical screenshot without actually publishing. If it’s not perfectly identical, you can go to the source editor and click ‘Preview’, which will actually render an identical page without publishing.
We really do take neutrality seriously – not primarily for our image but because, empirically, not doing that destroys the quality of the project.
don’t vandalize wikipedia :( editors work very hard for no pay
I can confirm as a longtime editor that:
I find this shit funny as hell in the short term, but
It does make our work harder.
If you really need to take a screenshot for the meme, please at least just use the VisualEditor, which is a what-you-see-is-what-you-get (WYSIWYG) editor that will allow for a near-identical screenshot without actually publishing. If it’s not perfectly identical, you can go to the source editor and click ‘Preview’, which will actually render an identical page without publishing.
We really do take neutrality seriously – not primarily for our image but because, empirically, not doing that destroys the quality of the project.
Alternatively you can also right click, press Inspect, and then edit the HTML, which will look perfect and also not actually change anything.
right click? what is this the stone age
the right click method goes directly into the selected elements
And it only further emboldens the idiots who think that Wikipedia is biased (largely against conservatives).
Wikipedia is biased against conservatives. Wikipedia requires citations.