• Hond@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        23 days ago

        holy shit, thats expensive for the 30 minutes it takes to install grapheneOS. with their web interface i would even trust my parents to not fuck up the installation of graphene.

        and if i had a threat model which involves disoldering sensors, microphones, etc i wouldnt trust them as a source. not because nitrokey is untrustworthy. just because atleast in my mind almost nobody is trustworthy enough.

        edit: just to be clear, no shade towards nitrokey. i just dont see the targeted customer base.

    • takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      23 days ago

      Is that another way of saying you won’t be interested?

      Graphene only support Google Pixel phones, so it disqualifies anything else.

      • Hond@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        23 days ago

        Sadly yes.

        I’m really in no hurry to give Google ever money again. But whenever my current Pixel irrepairably dies i will probably just get another used Pixel and flash Graphene on it. I can really get behind the spirit to get european made phones instead. But atleast for now they all come with too much compromises in one way or another.

      • Blaster M@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        23 days ago

        GrapheneOS is always looking out for a potential phone they can migrate to, since Google has stopped publishing the device trees for the Pixels. While they currently support the Pixels anyway, it is a long term goal for them to be on an independent platform.

        • takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          23 days ago

          Sounds like they should support those phones then. I don’t see reason they would block device trees.