50% i am sure it is stone, the other 50%, henge.
Maybe we should be calling it “Stone/Henge” then
Or as I’ve recently taken to calling it, Stone plus Henge. Henge is not a prehistoric megalith unto itself, but rather another free component of a fully functioning Stone system made useful by the Stone corelibs, shell utilities and vital system components comprising a full megalithic structure as defined by neolithic hunter-gatherers.
I will never get sick of this ridiculous copypasta
Found the Slackware user.
That’s exactly how I’ve always pronounced it, too.
They reached this conclusion after they found a bunch of papers and scissors laying about
So true!
Wtf is wrong with people
but they weren’t destroying the rock, right? they were just splitting it up into smaller rocks. I bet they’d have a heck of a time actually destroying that rock.
pretty undestructible if you ask me? /s
It can only be destroyed by throwing it into the heart of Mount Doom. Or other volcano.
Bonus fun fact: Stonehenge is not a true henge!
Oh my God, now we’re gatekeeping henges…
Based on the title for The Hill, is it even stone?
I mean if it was built out of anything else the destructible material has been looted or destroyed by now. You can say this about pretty much every old thing.
Energy of this thread: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=mbyzgeee2mg
Basalt is pretty tough I hear
As some one with experience in the rock crushing industry. Yes, yes it is
…uh, your link is just to a stupid image.
No it’s cake!
Is this Loss? This is Loss isn’t it
So much less destructible than Strawhenge or Woodhenge.
